ArticleSurgical neurology international2021
Intracranial pressure and laboratory parameters in high- and low-risk pregnant women.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive intracranial pressure profile in 31 patients submitted to fullendoscopic spine surgery.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2024Article
- Can a new noninvasive method for assessment of intracranial pressure predict intracranial hypertension and prognosis?Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy can trigger several pathological changes, thus representing a great challenge for gynecology and obstetrics. The objective is to evaluate high- and low-risk pregnant women through Intracranial pressure (ICP) and laboratory parameters.
methodsVolunteers clinical and laboratory data were collected from medical records and ICP was monitored through noninvasive method.
resultsStatistically significant differences were observed between the group of high-risk and low-risk pregnant women for serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and US-C-reactive protein (CRP) and a statistically positive association between blood pressure (BP) levels and plasma glucose. About 12.77% of the volunteers presented altered ICP. Higher BP values were encountered with the higher plasma glucose values. All ICP altered volunteers presented altered BP. ALP is among the most effective biochemical markers for assessing the risk of premature birth before 32 weeks of gestation.
conclusionWe have observed important changes on BP, serum glucose, US-CRP, and ALP thus indicating higher risk of complications during pregnancy. Even more, some of the volunteers presented altered ICP what could indicate cerebral compliance changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.