ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2021
Pelvic Abscess after Cesarean Section Treated with Laparoscopic Drainage.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Solution of C-Section Associated Surgical Site Infection in LMICs: A Narrative Review.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Transvaginal Pezzer Catheter Drainage in Treatment-Resistant Deep Pelvic Abscess After Cesarean Section: Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Maternal sepsis due to Bacteroides fragilis: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Review
- Laparoscopic Drainage of Severe Intra-abdominal Abscesses Following Cesarean Section: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Extraperitoneal Spillage in Ruptured Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Cureus · 2024Article
- Management of post-cesarean pelvic abscess in the uterine scar: A case report and mini-review of the literature.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean section (CS), the rate of which is increasing worldwide, may be associated with complications. Although pelvic abscess after CS is rare, it is difficult to treat. We herein report two cases of pelvic abscess treated laparoscopically after CS. The abscesses of the patients were located in the pouch of Douglas and the uterine scar after CS, respectively. Several days after CS, the patients presented with lower abdominal pain and fever. Laparoscopic drainage was performed because imaging revealed a pelvic abscess that was not amenable to drainage through interventional radiology. The patients recovered from infection and were discharged four days after drainage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.