ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
Researchers' experiences working with community advisory boards: How community member feedback impacted the research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Multiregional Decentralized Clinical Trial Program to Improve Access.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Educating, Contextualizing, and Deferring: Qualitative Investigation of Physician Communication About Chronic Kidney Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "With a little help from my friends" - collaborating with community experts to improve sampling and obtain a high response rate for a statewide naloxone availability survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
- One Herd: A Community Storytelling Campaign for Equity in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Bangkok Health Research and Ethics Interest Group: reflecting on the experiences of group members, researchers and facilitators participating in an urban community advisory board in Thailand.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Designing Electronic Problem-Solving Training for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods, Community-Based, Participatory Research Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Engaging patients and researchers in RECOVER clinical trial protocol development: Key lessons.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A case study of enhancing bidirectional feedback between research programs and an institutional community engagement advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Operationalising Inclusion for Participatory Design: Worked Examples for TRIPOD+AI & PROBAST+AI.Health services insights · 2026Article
- "No research about us, without us:" a qualitative study to engage with community research advisory boards in the urban community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A Community Advisory Board's Role in Disseminating Tai Chi Prime in African American and Latinx Communities: A Pragmatic Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Community advisory boards to inform behavioural health research in primary care: protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Planting the Seeds for Building Research Capacity in Communities: Experiences of a Community-Based Research Network.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- "Making our voices count": patient action groups as a strategy to engage people with lived experience in implementation of an intervention for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Community engagement contributions to rural health research: Researchers' experience with the Midwest Rural Health Research Community Advisory Board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Characteristics of research review boards in the context of community-academic settings: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Designing for dissemination through community advisory board engagement in an implementation mapping process: A case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo assess researchers' experiences working with community advisory boards (CABs) and perceptions of how community member stakeholder feedback impacted the research.
methodsIndividual interviews were conducted with researchers (
resultsResearchers reported that the CAB influenced research in the following domains: pre-research (24%), infrastructure (24%), study design (41%), implementation (41%), analysis (6%), dissemination (24%), and post-research activities (18%). The mean total score was = 1.8 (SD = 1.7, range: 0-6). Open-ended responses revealed major themes of CAB helpfulness in generating/refining ideas, identifying community partners, culturally tailored and targeted recruitment strategies, intervention design and delivery, and dissemination.
conclusionFindings from this preliminary evaluation indicate that despite positive experiences noted in open-ended feedback, the perceived quantitative impact of CAB feedback on the research was moderate. Bidirectional communication between researchers and community member stakeholders has the potential to make clinical and translational research more relevant and appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.