ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
A mentor training workshop focused on fostering diversity engenders lasting impact on mentoring techniques: Results of a long-term evaluation.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Career mentoring matters: A multi-component program for early-stage HIV investigators at the University of California, San Francisco.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Applying the realist evaluation framework to a faculty mentorship program: a context-mechanism-outcome analysis at a private medical university.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring barriers, needs, and facilitators for clinical and translational research in Oklahoma: A sequential mixed-methods study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Mentoring across differences: Introducing hidden curriculum competencies for scientific mentors.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Mentorship-A critical metric for career development and advancing global health.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Lessons for expanding virtual mentoring in academic medical institutions: a qualitative study among senior mentors.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Building stronger foundations: exploring a collaborative faculty mentoring workshop for in-depth growth.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The power of junior faculty mentoring committees.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- Establishment of a Private Foundation-Academic Partnership to Promote Careers of Early-Stage Investigators Examining the Influence of Sex and Gender on Health and Health Care.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- How to Sponsor, Coach, and Mentor: A Qualitative Study With Family Medicine Department Chairs.Family medicine · 2023Article
- Implementing a mentoring program for clinical research professionals: A novel professional development initiative for university health research staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Don't Wait Till Tomorrow: How to Support Underrepresented Undergraduate HIV Researchers Today From the Voices of Emerging Leaders.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTrainees and investigators from underrepresented minority (URM) backgrounds face unique challenges to establishing successful careers in clinical and translational research. Structured training for mentors is an important mechanism to increase the diversity of the research workforce. This article presents data from an evaluation of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Mentoring the Mentors program aimed at improving mentors' competency in working with diverse mentees in HIV research.
methodsMentors from around the USA who had in one of seven separate 2-day training workshops conducted from 2013 to 2020 were invited to participate in an online evaluation survey of their experiences with the training and their subsequent mentoring activities.
resultsThere was a high response rate (80%) among the 226 mentors invited to complete the survey. The 180 respondents were diverse in demographics, professional disciplines, and geographic distribution. Quantitative and qualitative data indicate a lasting positive impact of the training, with sustained improvements documented on a validated measure of self-appraised mentoring competency. Respondents also endorsed high interest in future, follow-up training with continued focus on topics related to mentoring in the context of diversity.
conclusionThe evaluation of the UCSF CFAR Mentoring the Mentors program showed lasting impact in improving mentoring practices, coupled with high interest in continued in-depth training in areas focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.