Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221358›Full record

ReviewJournal of global health2021

Macro level influences on strategic responses to the COVID-19 pandemic - an international survey and tool for national assessments.

Raheelah Ahmad, Rifat A Atun, Gabriel Birgand, Enrique Castro-Sánchez, Esmita Charani, Ewan B Ferlie, Izhar Hussain, Andrew Kambugu, Jaime Labarca, Gabriel Levy Hara and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interventional research to tackle antimicrobial resistance in Low Middle Income Countries in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons in resilience from an international consortium.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Challenges in Implementing the National Health Response to COVID-19 in Senegal.Global implementation research and applications · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Raheelah AhmadNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Rifat A AtunNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Gabriel BirgandNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Enrique Castro-SánchezNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Esmita CharaniNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Ewan B FerlieKing's Business School, King's College London, Bush House, London, UK.
Izhar HussainInstitute of Business & Health Management, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Andrew KambuguInfectious Disease Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jaime LabarcaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Gabriel Levy HaraUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos G Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin McKeeDepartment of Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Marc MendelsonDivision of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sanjeev SinghDepartment of Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kerala, India.
Jay VarmaAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nina J ZhuNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Walter ZinggNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Alison H HolmesNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
COMPASS (COntrol and Management of PAndemicS through Strategic analysis) study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation in the approaches taken to contain the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic at country level has been shaped by economic and political considerations, technical capacity, and assumptions about public behaviours. To address the limited application of learning from previous pandemics, this study aimed to analyse perceived facilitators and inhibitors during the pandemic and to inform the development of an assessment tool for pandemic response planning.

methodsA cross-sectional electronic survey of health and non-health care professionals (5 May - 5 June 2020) in six languages, with respondents recruited via email, social media and website posting. Participants were asked to score inhibitors (-10 to 0) or facilitators (0 to +10) impacting country response to COVID-19 from the following domains - Political, Economic, Sociological, Technological, Ecological, Legislative, and wider Industry (the PESTELI framework). Participants were then asked to explain their responses using free text. Descriptive and thematic analysis was followed by triangulation with the literature and expert validation to develop the assessment tool, which was then compared with four existing pandemic planning frameworks.

results928 respondents from 66 countries (57% health care professionals) participated. Political and economic influences were consistently perceived as powerful negative forces and technology as a facilitator across high- and low-income countries. The 103-item tool developed for guiding rapid situational assessment for pandemic planning is comprehensive when compared to existing tools and highlights the interconnectedness of the 7 domains.

conclusionsThe tool developed and proposed addresses the problems associated with decision making in disciplinary silos and offers a means to refine future use of epidemic modelling.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34221358
PMCPMC8248749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.