ArticleJournal of otology2021
Direction-fixed positional nystagmus following head-roll testing: how is it related with a vestibular pathology?
Article in Journal of otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of this study is to analyze the clinical view of patients with direction-fixed positional nystagmus (DFPN) following head-roll maneuver.
methodsSixty patients with DFPN were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the direction of nystagmus based on rotation side. Associated problems were documented, and cumulative data were compared between groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA test) was used for statistical analysis (
resultsThirty-three patients (55%) had stronger nystagmus beating towards the direction of head-roll (Group-A). Three patients developed geotropic LC-BPPV. Fourteen patients had inner ear disease. Sixteen patients (27%) had stronger nystagmus beating against the direction of head roll (Group-B). Nine patients had inner ear disease. None of the patients tested with head-shaking had change of direction of nystagmus. Eleven patients (18%) had DFPN with equal velocity during right or left head-roll maneuver (Group-C). Of those, nine patients had inner ear disease. None of the patients had change of direction of nystagmus. Comparison of the incidence of associated problems (migraine, vestibular neuronitis, Meniere's disease etc.) in each group was not statistically significant (
conclusionPatients with DFPN should be followed for a possibility of vestibular pathology since vestibular problem was documented for more than half of the patients in the follow-up. On the other hand, DFPN could be related with a temporary reason (thermal, physical or drug effect etc.) in some patients who do not exhibit any associated disease. Head-shaking testing is recommended to expose the lateral canal BPPV. But the incidence is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.