Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Basidiomycetes Are Particularly Sensitive to Bacterial Volatile Compounds: Mechanistic Insight Into the Case Study of

Maria Isabella Prigigallo, Angelo De Stradis, Abhishek Anand, Francesco Mannerucci, Floriane L'Haridon, Laure Weisskopf, Giovanni Bubici

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pyoluteorin Produced by the Biocontrol AgentPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Air Ambulance: Antimicrobial Power of Bacterial Volatiles.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Endophytic bacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms of Action of Microbial Biocontrol Agents againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Isabella PrigigalloIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy.
Angelo De StradisIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy.
Abhishek AnandDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Francesco MannerucciDipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Floriane L'HaridonDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Laure WeisskopfDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Giovanni BubiciIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy.
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITUniversity of Fribourg · CHUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play an important role in the communication among organisms, including plants, beneficial or pathogenic microbes, and pests.

Indexed as

antagonismbiocontrolbiological control agentsHeterobasidionmicrobe–microbe interactionPseudomonasvolatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID34220771
PMCPMC8248679
OpenAlexW3172892479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.