ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Printing Microbial Dark Matter: Using Single Cell Dispensing and Genomics to Investigate the Patescibacteria/Candidate Phyla Radiation.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivation-independent high-quality microbial genome reconstruction from environmental samples with midi-metagenomics.Genome research · 2026Article
- Ecology-microbiome engineering in Sauce-flavor Baijiu via Single-Cell Raman Spectroscopy.Biodesign research · 2026Review
- Exploring theFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Diverse Patescibacteria assemblages and prevalence of ultra-small free-living Parcubacteria along a subterranean estuary.mSystems · 2025Article
- Categorization of Bacteria That Leak from Activated Sludge to Secondary Treated Water: Year-round Observations.Microbes and environments · 2025Article
- Adaption mechanism and ecological role of CPR bacteria in brackish-saline groundwater.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Exploring Microbial Dark Matter for the Discovery of Novel Natural Products: Characteristics, Abundance Challenges and Methods.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- dna2bit: high performance genomic distance estimation software for microbial genome analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Taxonomic Re-Classification and Expansion of the Phylum Chloroflexota Based on over 5000 Genomes and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Using Genomics to Decipher the Enigmatic Properties and Survival Adaptation of Candidate Phyla Radiation.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Elucidating the functional roles of prokaryotic proteins using big data and artificial intelligence.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Microbial dark matter sequences verification in amplicon sequencing and environmental metagenomics data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- First shotgun metagenomics study of Juan de Fuca deep-sea sediments reveals distinct microbial communities above, within, between, and below sulfate methane transition zones.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- How clear is our current view on microbial dark matter? (Re-)assessing public MAG & SAG datasets with MDMcleaner.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Dual-layered hydrogels allow complete genome recovery with nucleic acid cytometry.Biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Functional characterization of prokaryotic dark matter: the road so far and what lies ahead.Current research in microbial sciences · 2022Review
- Advanced prokaryotic systematics: the modern face of an ancient science.New microbes and new infectionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As of today, the majority of environmental microorganisms remain uncultured. They are therefore referred to as "microbial dark matter." In the recent past, cultivation-independent methods like single-cell genomics (SCG) enabled the discovery of many previously unknown microorganisms, among them the Patescibacteria/Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR). This approach was shown to be complementary to metagenomics, however, the development of additional and refined sorting techniques beyond the most commonly used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is still desirable to enable additional downstream applications. Adding image information on the number and morphology of sorted cells would be beneficial, as would be minimizing cell stress caused by sorting conditions such as staining or pressure. Recently, a novel cell sorting technique has been developed, a microfluidic single-cell dispenser, which assesses the number and morphology of the cell in each droplet by automated light microscopic processing. Here, we report for the first time the successful application of the newly developed single-cell dispensing system for label-free isolation of individual bacteria from a complex sample retrieved from a wastewater treatment plant, demonstrating the potential of this technique for single cell genomics and other alternative downstream applications. Genome recovery success rated above 80% with this technique-out of 880 sorted cells 717 were successfully amplified. For 50.1% of these, analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was feasible and led to the sequencing of 50 sorted cells identified as Patescibacteria/CPR members. Subsequentially, 27 single amplified genomes (SAGs) of 15 novel and distinct Patescibacteria/CPR members, representing yet unseen species, genera and families could be captured and reconstructed. This phylogenetic distinctness of the recovered SAGs from available metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) is accompanied by the finding that these lineages-in whole or in part-have not been accessed by genome-resolved metagenomics of the same sample, thereby emphasizing the importance and opportunities of SCGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.