Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220712›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2021

The Role of Traditional Chinese Formula Ding-Kun Pill (DKP) in Expected Poor Ovarian Response Women (POSEIDON Group 4) Undergoing

Jing-Yan Song, Dan-Dan Gao, Xian-Ling Cao, Shan Xiang, Yan-Hua Chen, Yi-Li Teng, Xiu-Fang Li, Hai-Ping Liu, Fu-Xin Wang, Bin Zhang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Application of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Infertility.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jing-Yan SongThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Dan-Dan GaoCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Xian-Ling CaoCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Shan XiangThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yan-Hua ChenReproductive Medicine Center, Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Yi-Li TengReproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiu-Fang LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hai-Ping LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force Jinan, Jinan, China.
Fu-Xin WangCenter of Reproduction and Genetics, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Li-Hua XuReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Li ZhouDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Reproductive Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Xiang-Hong HuangReproduction & Genetics Center, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China.
Zhen-Gao SunThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNNanjing Medical University · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CNShandong University · CNTaiyuan Maternity and Child Care Hospital · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNXiangyang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of the study was to assess traditional Chinese formula DKP supplementation in terms of efficacy and safety on reproductive outcomes of expected poor ovarian responder (POR, POSEIDON Group 4) undergoing Design Setting and Participants: Women eligible for IVF-ET were invited to participate in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial at academic fertility centers of ten public hospitals in Chinese Mainland. A total of 462 patients (35-44 years) equally divided between DKP and placebo groups with antral follicle count (AFC) <5 or anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) <1.2 ng/ml were randomized. Interventions: All participants were given DKP or 7 g placebo twice daily on the previous menstrual cycle day 5 until oocyte retrieval, which took approximately 5 to 6 weeks. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy defined as more than 20 gestational weeks of an intrauterine living fetus confirmed by pelvic ultrasonography. Results: Demographic characteristics were equally distributed between the study populations. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis revealed that ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was not significantly different between DKP and placebo groups [26.4% (61/231) versus 24.2% (56/231); relative risk (RR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.49, Conclusion: This well-designed randomized controlled trial (RCT) offers new high-quality evidence to supplement existing retrospective literature concerning DKP performance in expected PORs. DKP could be recommended as a safe and natural remedy for expected PORs (aged 35-37 years) who fulfill the POSEIDON group 4 criteria. However, additional interventional clinical studies are undoubtedly required to be conducted in the future to validate this hypothesis. Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR1900026614.

Indexed as

AdultChinaDouble-Blind MethodEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfertility, FemaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalOocyte RetrievalOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RatePrognosisDing-Kun Pillin vitro fertilization-embryo transferlow prognosispoor ovarian responsePOSEIDON criteriatraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID34220712
PMCPMC8247913
OpenAlexW3174149868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.