Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220676›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Behavioral Assessment of Sensory, Motor, Emotion, and Cognition in Rodent Models of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Xiaoyu Shi, Huiying Bai, Junmin Wang, Jiarui Wang, Leo Huang, Meimei He, Xuejun Zheng, Zitian Duan, Danyang Chen, Jiaxin Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TAR syndrome causal genebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaoyu ShiDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huiying BaiZhengzhou University Hospital Outpatient Surgery Center, Zhengzhou, China.
Junmin WangDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiarui WangKeieger School of Arts and Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Leo HuangDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Meimei HeDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuejun ZhengDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zitian DuanDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Danyang ChenDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiaxin ZhangSaint John Paul the Great Catholic High School, Dumfries, VA, United States.
Xuemei ChenDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Johns Hopkins University · USZhengzhou University · CNJohn Paul the Great Catholic University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the second most common type of stroke and has one of the highest fatality rates of any disease. There are many clinical signs and symptoms after ICH due to brain cell injury and network disruption resulted from the rupture of a tiny artery and activation of inflammatory cells, such as motor dysfunction, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, and emotional disturbance, etc. Thus, researchers have established many tests to evaluate behavioral changes in rodent ICH models, in order to achieve a better understanding and thus improvements in the prognosis for the clinical treatment of stroke. This review summarizes existing protocols that have been applied to assess neurologic function outcomes in the rodent ICH models such as pain, motor, cognition, and emotion tests. Pain tests include mechanical, hot, and cold pain tests; motor tests include the following 12 types: neurologic deficit scale test, staircase test, rotarod test, cylinder test, grid walk test, forelimb placing test, wire hanging test, modified neurologic severity score, beam walking test, horizontal ladder test, and adhesive removal test; learning and memory tests include Morris water maze, Y-maze, and novel object recognition test; emotion tests include elevated plus maze, sucrose preference test, tail suspension test, open field test, and forced swim test. This review discusses these assessments by examining their rationale, setup, duration, baseline, procedures as well as comparing their pros and cons, thus guiding researchers to select the most appropriate behavioral tests for preclinical ICH research.

Indexed as

anxietybehavioral testscognitiondepressionemotionintracerebral hemorrhagemotor functionpain

Identifiers

PMID34220676
PMCPMC8248664
OpenAlexW3173271869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.