Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2021

Maturation of Heterogeneity in Afferent Synapse Ultrastructure in the Mouse Cochlea.

Shelby A Payne, Matthew S Joens, Heather Chung, Natalie Skigen, Adam Frank, Sonali Gattani, Kya Vaughn, Allison Schwed, Matt Nester, Atri Bhattacharyya and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In vivo spontaneous CaNature communications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reducing Auditory Nerve Excitability by Acute Antagonism of CaFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shelby A PayneDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Matthew S JoensCenter for Cellular Imaging, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Heather ChungDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Natalie SkigenDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Adam FrankDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sonali GattaniDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Kya VaughnDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Allison SchwedGraduate Program in Audiology and Communications Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Matt NesterDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Atri BhattacharyyaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Guhan IyerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Bethany DavisGraduate Program in Audiology and Communications Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jason CarlquistDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Honey PatelDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
James A J FitzpatrickCenter for Cellular Imaging, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Mark A RutherfordDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
EXCITATION AND EXCITOTOXICITY IN TYPE I COCHLEAR AFFERENTS: SYNAPTIC STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01DC014712 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Allen Rutherford · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) innervating the same inner hair cell (IHC) may have identical frequency tuning but different sound response properties. In cat and guinea pig, ANF response properties correlate with afferent synapse morphology and position on the IHC, suggesting a causal structure-function relationship. In mice, this relationship has not been fully characterized. Here we measured the emergence of synaptic morphological heterogeneities during maturation of the C57BL/6J mouse cochlea by comparing postnatal day 17 (p17, ∼3 days after hearing onset) with p34, when the mouse cochlea is mature. Using serial block face scanning electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction we measured the size, shape, vesicle content, and position of 70 ribbon synapses from the mid-cochlea. Several features matured over late postnatal development. From p17 to p34, presynaptic densities (PDs) and post-synaptic densities (PSDs) became smaller on average (PDs: 0.75 to 0.33; PSDs: 0.58 to 0.31 μm

Indexed as

developmental maturationFIB-SEMmodiolarpillarpostsynaptic densitypresynaptic densityribbon synapse ultrastructuresynaptic vesicles

Identifiers

PMID34220482
PMCPMC8248813
OpenAlexW3176177743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.