Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220455›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2021

Human Schwann Cell Transplantation for Spinal Cord Injury: Prospects and Challenges in Translational Medicine.

Paula V Monje, Lingxiao Deng, Xiao-Ming Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biomaterials and cell-based therapy post spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advance in pediatric spinal cord injury.Pediatric discovery · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula V MonjeSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Lingxiao DengSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Xiao-Ming XuSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Funding

Reprogramming reactive glial cells into functional new neurons after SCIR01NS111776 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WU, WEI, ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Modulation of lumbar motor circuitry after an above-level SCI and NT-3 gene therapyR01NS103481 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SMITH, GEORGE M, WU, WEI · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Constructing a growth-promoting pathway for functional regeneration after SCII01BX002356 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BROWN, TODD J, JONES, KATHRYN JANE · 2015 to 2023
–
Exercise and NT-3-mediated lumbar motoneuron plasticity and recovery after SCII01RX002687 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WALKER, CHANDLER · 2020 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002356BLRD VA I01 BX003705NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103481NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111776RRD VA I01 RX002687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefits of transplanting cultured Schwann cells (SCs) for the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) have been systematically investigated in experimental animals since the early 1990s. Importantly, human SC (hSC) transplantation for SCI has advanced to clinical testing and safety has been established via clinical trials conducted in the USA and abroad. However, multiple barriers must be overcome to enable accessible and effective treatments for SCI patients. This review presents available information on hSC transplantation for SCI with the intention to uncover gaps in our knowledge and discuss areas for future development. To this end, we introduce the historical progression of the work that supports existing and prospective clinical initiatives and explain the reasons for the choice of hSCs while also addressing their limitations as cell therapy products. A search of the relevant literature revealed that rat SCs have served as a preclinical model of reference since the onset of investigations, and that hSC transplants are relatively understudied, possibly due to the sophisticated resources and expertise needed for the traditional processing of hSC cultures from human nerves. In turn, we reason that additional experimentation and a reexamination of the available data are needed to understand the therapeutic value of hSC transplants taking into consideration that the manufacturing of the hSCs themselves may require further development for extended uses in basic research and clinical settings.

Indexed as

biotherapeutic productscell therapyclinical trialsfunctional recoverymyelinationregenerationSchwann cellsspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID34220455
PMCPMC8249939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.