Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220397›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2021

Let's Try Social Prescribing in Sweden (SPiS) - an Interventional Project Targeting Loneliness among Older Adults Using a Model for Integrated Care: A Research Protocol.

Erika Johansson, Frida Jonsson, Emil Rapo, Anna-Sofia Lundgren, Åsa Hörnsten, Ingeborg Nilsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global Trends in Social Prescribing: Web-Based Crawling Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika JohanssonUmeå University, SE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-1821
Frida JonssonUmeå University, SE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-3798
Emil RapoUmeå University, SE.
Anna-Sofia LundgrenUmeå University, SE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-5704
Åsa HörnstenUmeå University, SE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-6512
Ingeborg NilssonUmeå University, SE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-5769
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoneliness and social isolation among older adults (≥65) are an emerging issue of public concern, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Today there is no systematic intervention developed, implemented or evaluated in Sweden addressing loneliness. The overall aim for this project is to develop, test and refine a person-centred Swedish model for social prescribing (SPiS), and to assess whether and how it reduces loneliness, promotes health and improves well-being among older adults. DESCRIPTION: The focus will be to develop, culturally adapt, evaluate and refine the SPiS model. Following the sequential structure of realist evaluation in three consecutive phases qualitative and quantitative data along with subsequent analysis methods will be collected and utilized. The project will provide knowledge of what works with the social prescribing model, for whom, in what conditions and why, in relation to loneliness, health and well-being among older adults. DISCUSSION: SPiS has the unique position of providing initial knowledge regarding how to reduce loneliness in the Swedish context. However, evaluation is complex as this research goes beyond the unidimensional question "Is it working?".

conclusionDeveloping, implementing and evaluating such a complex program needs systematic and close evaluation.

Indexed as

complex interventionintegrated carelonelinessrealist evaluationsocial participationsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID34220397
PMCPMC8231464
OpenAlexW3176593089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.