Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34220299›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2021

An Improved Computational Prediction Model for Lysine Succinylation Sites Mapping on

Samme Amena Tasmia, Fee Faysal Ahmed, Parvez Mosharaf, Mehedi Hasan, Nurul Haque Mollah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samme Amena Tasmia1Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh; 2Department of Mathematics, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh; 3Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fee Faysal Ahmed1Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh; 2Department of Mathematics, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh; 3Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Parvez Mosharaf1Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh; 2Department of Mathematics, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh; 3Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Mehedi Hasan1Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh; 2Department of Mathematics, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh; 3Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nurul Haque Mollah1Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh; 2Department of Mathematics, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh; 3Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLysine succinylation is one of the reversible protein post-translational modifications (PTMs), which regulate the structure and function of proteins. It plays a significant role in various cellular physiologies including some diseases of human as well as many other organisms. The accurate identification of succinylation site is essential to understand the various biological functions and drug development.

methodsIn this study, we developed an improved method to predict lysine succinylation sites mapping on

resultsThe CV results showed that the proposed predictor achieves the highest scores of sensitivity (SN) as 0.800, specificity (SP) as 0.902, accuracy (ACC) as 0.919, Mathew correlation coefficient (MCC) as 0.766 and partial AUC (pAUC) as 0.163 at a false-positive rate (FPR) = 0.10 and area under the ROC curve (AUC) as 0.958. It achieved the highest performance scores of SN as 0.811, SP as 0.902, ACC as 0.891, MCC as 0.629 and pAUC as 0.139 and AUC as 0.921 for the independent test protein set-1 and SN as 0.772, SP as 0.901, ACC as 0.836, MCC as 0.677 and pAUC as 0.141 at FPR = 0.10 and AUC as 0.923 for the independent test protein set-2. It also outperformed all the other existing prediction models.

conclusionThe prediction performances as discussed in this article recommend that the proposed method might be a useful and encouraging computational resource for lysine succinylation site prediction in the case of human population.

Indexed as

encoding schemesfeature selectionfusion modellysine succinylation sitepredictionProtein sequencesrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID34220299
PMCPMC8188582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.