Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219887›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2020

Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Thyroid Cancer: Institutional Experience.

Matea Pešorda, Sanja Kusačić Kuna, Dražen Huić, Davorin Herceg, Marija Despot, Tatjana Samardžić, Milena Gnjidić, Borislav Belev

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matea Pešorda1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sanja Kusačić Kuna1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dražen Huić1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Davorin Herceg1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marija Despot1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tatjana Samardžić1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Milena Gnjidić1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Borislav Belev1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Clinical Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3The University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 4The University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most patients with thyroid cancer have a favorable clinical course, some patients develop a more aggressive type of cancer and exhibit more rapid disease progression with worse prognosis. Those patients usually exhibit mutations of proteins such as tyrosine kinase enzymes that play a significant role in regulation of tumor proliferation and spreading. Development of targeted therapies is based on the inhibition of mutated kinases which are involved in the MAPK signaling pathway. The aim of this study was to present the initial results of clinical experience with kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC), and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) who exhibited rapid disease progression. A total of 17 adult patients (11 women, mean age 53.3 years) managed for progressive, metastatic disease were included in the study. Twelve patients with DTC and PDTC were previously tested for BRAF mutations, of whom nine that had tumor tissue negative for the BRAF V600E mutation received sorafenib, while three patients with tumors harboring the BRAF V600E mutation were treated with vemurafenib. Patients with MTC were treated with sunitinib, vandetanib, and sorafenib. Two patients with tumors harboring the BRAF mutation treated with vemurafenib showed restoration of radioiodine uptake. Most of patients showed significant improvement in disease status but of limited duration until disease progression. Although there was an improvement in progression-free survival, future research has to achieve a greater and longer-lasting response, probably by utilizing combined targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineThyroid NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansIodine RadioisotopesMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsSunitinibIodine RadioisotopesProtein Kinase InhibitorsSunitinibthyroid cancertyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34219887
PMCPMC8212607
OpenAlexW3180826574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.