Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219879›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2020

Thyroglobulin Measurement in Needle Aspiration for Detection of Recurrences and Neck Metastases in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Significance of Anti-Tg Antibodies.

Ivan Blažeković, Matija Romić, Marija Bosak Butković, Ines Šiško Markoš, Vedrana Gladić Nenadić, Valentina Vidranski, Petra Petranović Ovčariček, Dražena Krilić, Tea Varjačić, Josip Staničić and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivan Blažeković1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Matija Romić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Marija Bosak Butković1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Ines Šiško Markoš1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Vedrana Gladić Nenadić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Valentina Vidranski1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Petra Petranović Ovčariček1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Dražena Krilić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Tea Varjačić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Josip Staničić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Roko Granić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Marija Punda1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Ivan Mihaljević1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Tomislav Jukić1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
Maja Franceschi1Department of Oncology and Nuclear medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Department for Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Osijek University Hospital Center, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has increased in recent decades, likely due to frequent use of cervical ultrasonography (US) and US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA)., US is performed during follow-up after thyroidectomy, and US-guided FNA with cytology is used if suspicious cervical lymph nodes (LN) or thyroid bed masses are detected. Knowing that serum anti-Tg antibodies (sTgAb) affect the use of serum Tg (sTg) as a tumor marker, the aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of Tg determination in needle aspirates (FNA-Tg) in presence of sTgAb. This retrospective study included 149 patients with DTC and 159 aspirations of suspicious LN and thyroid bed masses. As expected, there was a negative correlation between sTg and sTgAb levels (p<0.05), while FNA-Tg levels had a positive correlation with FNA-TgAb levels (p<0.05). Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between sTg and FNA-Tg levels (p<0.05), but not between sTgAb and FNA-TgAb or sTgAb and FNA-Tg. In conclusion, these results show that FNA-Tg values were not affected by sTgAb and that FNA-Tg measurement were highly effective in detecting cervical DTC metastases. However, combined use with cytology is suggested for neck evaluation because cytology could reveal metastases from other tumor sites.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesThyroglobulinThyroglobulindifferentiated thyroid carcinomafine needle aspiration (FNA)FNA anti-Tg antibodies (FNA-TgAb)neck ultrasonographyserum anti-Tg antibodies (sTg-Ab)serum thyroglobulin (sTg)thyroglobulin (Tg) in FNA (FNA-Tg)

Identifiers

PMID34219879
PMCPMC8212602
OpenAlexW3130071554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.