Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219849›Full record

ArticlePolitical psychology2021

Personal and Political: Post-Traumatic Stress Through the Lens of Social Identity, Power, and Politics.

Orla T Muldoon, Robert D Lowe, Jolanda Jetten, Tegan Cruwys, S Alexander Haslam

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Political psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05470361 (Investigating the Effects of Stellate Ganglion Block and Superior Cervical Ganglion Block on Sleep and Recovery Using Biometric Capture Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05470361 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Effects of Stellate Ganglion Block and Superior Cervical Ganglion Block on Sleep and Recovery Using Biometric Capture Devices

TypeobservationalSponsorThe University of QueenslandRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsPTSDArmsstellate ganglion block (SGB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Social group connections support mental health following wildfire.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Still Standing Inside: A Local Idiom Related to Trauma among Namibian Speakers of Khoekhoegowab.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The Political Psychology of COVID-19.Political psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orla T MuldoonUniversity of Limerick.
Robert D LoweManchester Metropolitan University.
Jolanda JettenUniversity of Queensland.
Tegan CruwysAustralian National University.
S Alexander HaslamUniversity of Queensland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has always been controversial and highly politicized. Here, using a social identity approach, we review evidence that trauma and its aftermath are fundamentally linked to social position, sociopolitical capital, and power. We begin this contribution by demonstrating how a person's group memberships (and the social identities they derive from these memberships) are inherently linked to the experience of adversity. We then go on to consider how it is through group memberships that individuals are defined by their trauma risk and trauma histories-that is, a person's group memberships and their trauma are often inherently linked. Considering the importance of group memberships for understanding trauma, we argue that it is important to see these, and group processes more generally, as more than just "demographic" risk factors. Instead, we argue that when groups are defined by their trauma history or risk, their members will often derive some sense of self from this trauma. For this reason, attributes of group memberships are important in developing an understanding of adjustment and adaptation to trauma. In particular, groups' status, their recourse to justice, and the level of trust and solidarity within the group are all central to the impact of traumatic events on individual-level psychological resilience. We review evidence that supports this analysis by focusing on the exacerbating effects of stigma and social mistrust on post-traumatic stress, and the value of solidarity and strong identities for resilience. We conclude that because of these group-related processes, trauma interweaves the personal with the political and that post-traumatic stress is fundamentally about power, positionality, and politics.

Indexed as

groupspsychological traumaPTSDsocial identitytraumatic events

Identifiers

PMID34219849
PMCPMC8247337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.