Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219260›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.

Lingxiao Wang, Richard Valliant, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lingxiao WangThe Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-615X
Richard ValliantThe Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9176-2961
Yan LiThe Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-7464

Funding

Improving Population Representativeness of the Inference from Non-Probability Sample AnalysisR03CA252782 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LI, YAN · 2020 to 2020
$155k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA252782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many epidemiologic studies forgo probability sampling and turn to nonprobability volunteer-based samples because of cost, response burden, and invasiveness of biological samples. However, finite population (FP) inference is difficult to make from the nonprobability sample due to the lack of population representativeness. Aiming for making inferences at the population level using nonprobability samples, various inverse propensity score weighting methods have been studied with the propensity defined by the participation rate of population units in the nonprobability sample. In this article, we propose an adjusted logistic propensity weighting (ALP) method to estimate the participation rates for nonprobability sample units. The proposed ALP method is easy to implement by ready-to-use software while producing approximately unbiased estimators for population quantities regardless of the nonprobability sample rate. The efficiency of the ALP estimator can be further improved by scaling the survey sample weights in propensity estimation. Taylor linearization variance estimators are proposed for ALP estimators of FP means that account for all sources of variability. The proposed ALP methods are evaluated numerically via simulation studies and empirically using the naïve unweighted National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III sample, while taking the 1997 National Health Interview Survey as the reference, to estimate the 15-year mortality rates.

Indexed as

Research DesignVolunteersComputer SimulationHumansNutrition SurveysPropensity Scorefinite population inferencenonprobability samplepropensity score weightingsurvey samplingvariance estimation

Identifiers

PMID34219260
PMCPMC8526388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.