ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction for Participation Bias in Nonprobability Samples Using Multiple Reference Surveys.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- A two-step approach to simultaneously correct for selection and misclassification bias in nonprobability samples from hard-to-reach populations.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Analysis of rare events in healthcare intervention using department of defense data: intravenous immune globulin therapy for bullous pemphigoid.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Data-integration with pseudoweights and survey-calibration: application to developing US-representative lung cancer risk models for use in screening.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2025Article
- Improving prevalence estimates of mental health and well-being indicators among sexual minority men: a propensity-weighting approach.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Using Auxiliary Information in Probability Survey Data to Improve Pseudo-Weighting in Nonprobability Samples: A Copula Model Approach.Journal of survey statistics and methodology · 2024Article
- Article
- Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.Journal of official statistics · 2022Article
- Estimated Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Anxiety and Depression Among US Adults During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Science translational medicine · 2021Article
- Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in obesity and body fat distribution: An All of Us Research Program demonstration project.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many epidemiologic studies forgo probability sampling and turn to nonprobability volunteer-based samples because of cost, response burden, and invasiveness of biological samples. However, finite population (FP) inference is difficult to make from the nonprobability sample due to the lack of population representativeness. Aiming for making inferences at the population level using nonprobability samples, various inverse propensity score weighting methods have been studied with the propensity defined by the participation rate of population units in the nonprobability sample. In this article, we propose an adjusted logistic propensity weighting (ALP) method to estimate the participation rates for nonprobability sample units. The proposed ALP method is easy to implement by ready-to-use software while producing approximately unbiased estimators for population quantities regardless of the nonprobability sample rate. The efficiency of the ALP estimator can be further improved by scaling the survey sample weights in propensity estimation. Taylor linearization variance estimators are proposed for ALP estimators of FP means that account for all sources of variability. The proposed ALP methods are evaluated numerically via simulation studies and empirically using the naïve unweighted National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III sample, while taking the 1997 National Health Interview Survey as the reference, to estimate the 15-year mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.