Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219219›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2021

An updated infra-familial classification of Sapindaceae based on targeted enrichment data.

Sven Buerki, Martin W Callmander, Pedro Acevedo-Rodriguez, Porter P Lowry, Jérôme Munzinger, Paul Bailey, Olivier Maurin, Grace E Brewer, Niroshini Epitawalage, William J Baker and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unraveling the Ancient Introgression History ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Australian Rainforests-A Living Museum of Natural Product Chemical Diversity.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chloroplast genome assembly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sven BuerkiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-6539
Martin W CallmanderConservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève, ch. de l'Impératrice 1, CP 71, 1292, Chambésy, Switzerland.
Pedro Acevedo-RodriguezDepartment of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C., 20013-7012, USA.
Porter P LowryMissouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.
Jérôme MunzingerAMAP, Université Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Paul BaileyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Grace E BrewerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Niroshini EpitawalageRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseThe economically important, cosmopolitan soapberry family (Sapindaceae) comprises ca. 1900 species in 144 genera. Since the seminal work of Radlkofer, several authors have attempted to overcome challenges presented by the family's complex infra-familial classification. With the advent of molecular systematics, revisions of the various proposed groupings have provided significant momentum, but we still lack a formal classification system rooted in an evolutionary framework.

methodsNuclear DNA sequence data were generated for 123 genera (86%) of Sapindaceae using target sequence capture with the Angiosperms353 universal probe set. HybPiper was used to produce aligned DNA matrices. Phylogenetic inferences were obtained using coalescence-based and concatenated methods. The clades recovered are discussed in light of both benchmark studies to identify synapomorphies and distributional evidence to underpin an updated infra-familial classification. KEY

resultsCoalescence-based and concatenated phylogenetic trees had identical topologies and node support, except for the placement of Melicoccus bijugatus Jacq. Twenty-one clades were recovered, which serve as the basis for a revised infra-familial classification.

conclusionsTwenty tribes are recognized in four subfamilies: two tribes in Hippocastanoideae, two in Dodonaeoideae, and 16 in Sapindoideae (no tribes are recognized in the monotypic subfamily Xanthoceratoideae). Within Sapindoideae, six new tribes are described: Blomieae Buerki & Callm.; Guindilieae Buerki, Callm. & Acev.-Rodr.; Haplocoeleae Buerki & Callm.; Stadmanieae Buerki & Callm.; Tristiropsideae Buerki & Callm.; and Ungnadieae Buerki & Callm. This updated classification provides a backbone for further research and conservation efforts on this family.

Indexed as

SapindaceaeBiological EvolutionPhylogenybiogeographyinfrafamilial classificationnew tribesSapindaceaeSapindalestargeted enrichmenttaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID34219219
PMCPMC8361682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.