Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219198›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2021

Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.

Yashodhan M Bichu, Ismaeel Hansa, Aditi Y Bichu, Pratik Premjani, Carlos Flores-Mir, Nikhilesh R Vaid

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348109 (Assessment of Decision Support System Software in Extraction and Anchorage Planning Among Adult Patients Using Computer Algorithm), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348109 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Decision Support System Software in Extraction and Anchorage Planning Among Adult Patients Using Computer Algorithm

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsCases That Need Extraction of Teeth in Orthodontics, Anchorage PlanningArmsWell finished cases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Charting the artificial intelligence revolution in orthodontics : A bibliometric analysis of key players, collaborations, and research directions.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yashodhan M Bichu, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Ismaeel Hansa, Durban, South Africa. drismaeelhansa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6070-4534
Aditi Y Bichu, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Pratik Premjani, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Carlos Flores-MirDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nikhilesh R VaidDepartment of Orthodontics, European University College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis scoping review aims to provide an overview of the existing evidence on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in orthodontics, its translation into clinical practice, and what limitations do exist that have precluded their envisioned application.

methodsA scoping review of the literature was carried out following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed was searched until July 2020.

resultsSixty-two articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 43 out of the 62 studies (69.35%) were published this last decade. The majority of these studies were from the USA (11), followed by South Korea (9) and China (7). The number of studies published in non-orthodontic journals (36) was more extensive than in orthodontic journals (26). Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) were found to be the most commonly utilized AI/ML algorithm (13 studies), followed by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (9 studies each), and regression (8 studies). The most commonly studied domains were diagnosis and treatment planning-either broad-based or specific (33), automated anatomic landmark detection and/or analyses (19), assessment of growth and development (4), and evaluation of treatment outcomes (2). The different characteristics and distribution of these studies have been displayed and elucidated upon therein.

conclusionThis scoping review suggests that there has been an exponential increase in the number of studies involving various orthodontic applications of AI and ML. The most commonly studied domains were diagnosis and treatment planning, automated anatomic landmark detection and/or analyses, and growth and development assessment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOrthodonticsAlgorithmsChinaHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID34219198
PMCPMC8255249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.