Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219196›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The role of teledentistry in oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative literature review.

Helbert Eustáquio Cardoso da Silva, Glaucia Nize Martins Santos, André Ferreira Leite, Carla Ruffeil Moreira Mesquita, Paulo Tadeu de Souza Figueiredo, Paula Elaine Diniz Dos Reis, Cristine Miron Stefani, Nilce Santos de Melo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helbert Eustáquio Cardoso da SilvaDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil. helbertcardososilva@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6987
Glaucia Nize Martins SantosDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-4323
André Ferreira LeiteDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7803-4740
Carla Ruffeil Moreira MesquitaDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-9345
Paulo Tadeu de Souza FigueiredoDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.
Paula Elaine Diniz Dos ReisNursing Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-3366
Cristine Miron StefaniDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9779
Nilce Santos de MeloDentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-485X
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis integrative review aimed to assess the benefits of the use of teledentistry for patients undergoing treatment of oral and head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Embase, Open Grey, Google Scholar, and Jstor databases for studies referring to the management, control, and assistance, through teledentistry, to patients with oral and head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsWe found 356 references in the databases, 209 after duplicates removal, 23 met criteria for full-text reading, and 11 studies were included for qualitative synthesis, in four categories: virtual visits, use of remote technology, patient's satisfaction, multidisciplinary approach in teledentistry. We found that 78% of patients currently preferred teledentistry; 92% of patients would recommend the use of video consultation to other patients. The continuity of dental care, the reduction of patient visits to the hospital, the reduction of the risk of infection with the coronavirus, and limitation of face-to-face consultations to protect health professionals are benefits that reinforce the use of teledentistry by health institutions. Two studies showed patients' satisfaction with the use of teledentistry in monitoring cancer patients and showed an improvement in quality of life.

conclusionsThe teledentistry, as a remote technology for monitoring patients with oral and head and neck cancer, is well accepted by patients in preliminary studies. Although these studies pointed out some benefits of using remote technologies for the care of cancer patients, further robust scientific evidence is still needed in this regard.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mouth NeoplasmsTelemedicineHumansPandemicsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Head and neck cancerIntegrative reviewOral cancerTeledentistryTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34219196
PMCPMC8255116
OpenAlexW3178907374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.