Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34219107›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Psychological Effects on Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Single-center Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Tokyo, Japan.

Motonao Ishikawa, Tomoko Ogasawara, Kenichiro Takahashi, Takuya Ono, Kazuhiro Matsui, Shoko Marshall, Ayana Sakurai, Yoshikazu Aoka, Tempei Otsubo, Yasuto Sato and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is This All COVID-19's Fault? A Study on Trainees in One of the Most Affected Italian Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Motonao IshikawaDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Tomoko OgasawaraDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Kenichiro TakahashiDepartment of Pediatrics, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Takuya OnoDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Kazuhiro MatsuiDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Shoko MarshallDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Ayana SakuraiDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Yoshikazu AokaGeneral Medical Department, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Tempei OtsuboDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Yasuto SatoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan.
Hiroshi SakuraDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.
Yasuko UchigataDirector, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The present study analyzed the psychological status of healthcare workers in Japan and the influencing factors during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic. Methods An online survey was conducted from July 22 to August 21, 2020. A total of 328 of the 1,029 medical staff members in our university hospital participated in the study. Their mental health was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the mental health outcomes. Results Of the respondents, 78.0% reported psychological distress. Overall, we found that women, non-physicians, those who lived alone, and younger respondents had significantly greater psychological distress than their counterparts. The multivariate regression analysis showed that four factors were extracted as independent 12-item General Health Questionnaire-related factors: the lack of a sense of mission as a medical professional, the burden of the change in the quality of work, the lack of understanding about virus infectivity, and a strong sense of duty. Conclusion In summary, we found a high prevalence of psychological distress among healthcare workers during the 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Japan. Independent risk factors for psychological distress were the burden of the change in the quality of work, the lack of understanding about virus infectivity, a sense of responsibility, and the lack of a strong motivation and drive to help.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJapanSARS-CoV-2Tertiary Care CentersTokyo12-item General Health QuestionnaireCOVID-19; healthcare workershealth surveypsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID34219107
PMCPMC8479219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.