Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34218378›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Occurrence and health risk assessment of arsenic and heavy metals in groundwater of three industrial areas in Delhi, India.

Majed Alsubih, Rachida El Morabet, Roohul Abad Khan, Nadeem Ahmad Khan, Mansour Ul Haq Khan, Sirajuddin Ahmed, Abdul Qadir, Fazlollah Changani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Majed AlsubihDepartment of Civil Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rachida El MorabetDepartment of Geography, LADES-Lab, FLSH-M, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia, Morocco.
Roohul Abad KhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Nadeem Ahmad KhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India. er.nadimcivil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-9639
Mansour Ul Haq KhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Sirajuddin AhmedDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Abdul QadirEnvironmental Remote Sensing, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang Island, 11800, Gelugor, Malaysia.
Fazlollah ChanganiDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groundwater is a primary natural water source in the absence of surface water bodies. Groundwater in urban environments experiences unprecedented stress from urban growth, population increase, and industrial activities. This study assessed groundwater quality in terms of arsenic and heavy metal contamination in three industrial areas (Shahdara, Jhilmil, and Patparganj), Delhi, India. The water quality was assessed over a 3-year time interval (i.e., 2015 and 2018). The groundwater constituents investigated were As, Fe, Cr, Cd, Ni, Zn, Mn, Cu, and Pb. Metal index and heavy metal pollution indexes were estimated to assess groundwater pollution. The health risk was evaluated in terms of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk assessment. Patparganj industrial area saw increment in concentration for Cu 0.23 mg/L (2015)-0.85 mg/L (2018), Zn 0.51 mg/L (2015)-7.2 mg/L (2018), Fe 0.32 mg/L (2015)-0.9 mg/L (2018), Cr 0.21 mg/L (2015)-0.26 mg/L (2018), Mn 0.14 mg/L (2015)-0.25 mg/L (2018), Ni 0.04 mg/L (2015)-0.34 mg/L (2018), and As 0.01 mg/L (2015)-0.18 mg/L (2018). Cd and Pb concentrations were observed to decrease by 40-90 % and 85-99% for all the three industrial areas. Metal index and heavy metal index values were found to be >1 for all locations. The risk quotient value > 1 was observed for all locations in the year 2015 but was found to increase further to a range of RQ 10-62 in the year 2018, inferring increased non-carcinogenic risk to consumers. The carcinogenic risk was significant with respect to Fe (0.2-0.7), Zn (0.001-0.007), and As (0.002-0.003) for all locations in the year 2015. This study concludes that groundwater in the three industrial areas is highly polluted and is not fit for human consumption. Further studies are required to explore possible control measures and develop methods to mitigate groundwater pollution, sustainable management, and optimized use to conserve it for future generations.

Indexed as

ArsenicGroundwaterMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIndiaRisk AssessmentArsenicMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalGroundwaterHealth risk assessmentHeavy metalsIndustrial areasPollution index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.