SynthesisCurrent rheumatology reports2021
Wind of Change in the Treatment of Childhood-Onset Takayasu Arteritis: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current rheumatology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- New avenues in childhood vasculitis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Review
- Childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis: clinical presentation, challenges and disease course.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe lack evidence-based data for the treatment of childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis (c-TA) since it is a rare disease in children. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to evaluate the treatment choices in c-TA patients and integrate our experience for the treatment of our patients in the recent years/in the biologic era. RECENT
findingsWe reviewed 24 articles addressing treatments of 413 c-TA patients. Steroids were given to 352 patients (85.2%) as the main immunosuppressive therapy. Other immunosuppressive agents included methotrexate (37.3%), cyclophosphamide (24.5%), azathioprine (16.9%), and mycophenolate mofetil (7.9%). Besides, various biological agents were used, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in 70 of 107 c-TA patients (65.4%) and interleukin-6 inhibitors in 33 of them (30.8%). Biologics are increasingly used in our center as well. Even in severe patients, CYC is switched to either anti-TNF or antiIL6 once disease control is achieved. Recently, in addition to conventional immunosuppressants, biologics are increasingly used in c-TA. We have revised our treatment protocol to start with 1-3 doses of high-dose steroids and CYC, in a child with TA with types III-V involvement and high acute phase reactants; once clinical features subside and CRP normalizes, biologics should be started to replace CYC while decreasing the steroid dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.