ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021
Feasibility of underwater microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a technical note.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Keyhole retrosigmoid approach for microvascular decompression surgery: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Application of Endoscopic Underwater Surgery for Brain Tumors from Ventricle to Cistern: A Report of Pediatric and Elderly Cases.NMC case report journal · 2025Article
- Combined Exoscopic and Endoscopic Technique for Craniofacial Resection.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present a case series of underwater microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) and an evaluation of its feasibility and safety.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at a single institution and included 20 patients with HFS who underwent underwater MVD between September 2019 and January 2021. Surgery was performed in 3 steps, as follows: exoscopic wound opening (soft tissue, bone, dura, and arachnoid around the cerebellomedullary cistern), underwater endoscopic surgery (decompression of the facial nerve), and exoscopic wound closure. In underwater endoscopic surgery, the surgical field was continuously irrigated with artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Abnormal muscle response and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were monitored.
resultsNeurovascular conflicts were clearly observed in all patients without fogging and soiling of the endoscope lens. HFS was completely relieved in 19 patients (95%). An amplitude reduction of wave V of BAEPs of more than 50% was not observed in any of the cases. In 5 cases (25%), the latency of wave V of BAEPs was prolonged for more than 1.0 ms; these changes completely or near completely returned to baseline values at dural closure in all 5 cases. A postoperative complication of transient facial palsy was observed in 1 patient (5%) during postoperative days 10-30. There were no other complications.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that underwater MVD is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of HFS. However, it did not show advantages over conventional endoscopic MVD when the protective effect on the eighth cranial nerve was evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34218323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.