Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34218306›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2022

Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care.

Philipp Herzog, Bernhard Osen, Christian Stierle, Thomas Middendorf, Ulrich Voderholzer, Stefan Koch, Matthias Feldmann, Winfried Rief, Eva-Lotta Brakemeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philipp HerzogDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. philipp.herzog@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-2083
Bernhard OsenSchön-Klinik Bad Bramstedt, Psychosomatic Clinic, Birkenweg 10, 24576, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.
Christian StierleSchön-Klinik Bad Bramstedt, Psychosomatic Clinic, Birkenweg 10, 24576, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.
Thomas MiddendorfSchön-Klinik Bad Arolsen, Psychosomatic Clinic, Hofgarten 10, 34454, Bad Arolsen, Germany.
Ulrich VoderholzerSchön-Klinik Roseneck, Psychosomatic Clinic, Am Roseneck 6, 83209, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany.
Stefan KochSchön-Klinik Roseneck, Psychosomatic Clinic, Am Roseneck 6, 83209, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany.
Matthias FeldmannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Winfried RiefDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Eva-Lotta BrakemeierDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60.4% female) having received evidence-based psychotherapy based on the cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in five German psychotherapeutic clinics was analyzed. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for several outcome variables to determine effectiveness. Predictor analyses were performed on a subsample (N = 514; M = 34.3 years, SD = 12.2; 60.3% female). For this purpose, the number of potential predictors was reduced using factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis to identify robust predictors. Effect sizes of various outcome variables could be classified as large (g = 1.34 of OCD-symptom change). Predictors of changes in OCD and depressive symptoms were symptom severity at admission and general psychopathological distress. In addition, patients with higher social support and more washing compulsions benefited more from treatment. Subgroup analyses showed a distinct predictor profile of changes in compulsions and obsessions. The results indicate that an evidence-based psychotherapy program for OCD can be effectively implemented in routine inpatient care. In addition to well-established predictors, social support, and washing compulsions in particular were identified as important positive predictors. Specific predictor profiles for changes in obsessions and compulsions are discussed.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdultFemaleHumansMalePrognosisTreatment OutcomeEffectivenessObsessive–compulsive disorderPatient characteristicsPredictorsPrognostic variables

Identifiers

PMID34218306
PMCPMC8866294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.