Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34218299›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Spatial asymmetries ("pseudoneglect") in free visual exploration-modulation of age and relationship to line bisection.

Kathrin Chiffi, Lorenzo Diana, Matthias Hartmann, Dario Cazzoli, Claudio L Bassetti, René M Müri, Aleksandra K Eberhard-Moscicka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contrast affects stimulus detection in natural scenes.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin ChiffiPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7744-3702
Lorenzo DianaPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-5311
Matthias HartmannPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-1339
Dario CazzoliPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-7153
Claudio L BassettiDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4535-0245
René M MüriPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-4188
Aleksandra K Eberhard-MoscickaPerception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstarsse 46, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. aleksandra.eberhard@neuro.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-5152
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 160803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When humans visually explore an image, they typically tend to start exploring its left side. This phenomenon, so-called pseudoneglect, is well known, but its time-course has only sparsely been studied. Furthermore, it is unclear whether age influences pseudoneglect, and the relationship between visuo-spatial attentional asymmetries in a free visual exploration task and a classical line bisection task has not been established. To address these questions, 60 healthy participants, aged between 22 and 86, were assessed by means of a free visual exploration task with a series of naturalistic, colour photographs of everyday scenes, while their gaze was recorded by means of a contact-free eye-tracking system. Furthermore, a classical line bisection task was administered, and information concerning handedness and subjective alertness during the experiment was obtained. The results revealed a time-sensitive window during visual exploration, between 260 and 960 ms, in which age was a significant predictor of the leftward bias in gaze position, i.e., of pseudoneglect. Moreover, pseudoneglect as assessed by the line bisection task correlated with the average gaze position throughout a time-window of 300-1490 ms during the visual exploration task. These results suggest that age influences visual exploration and pseudoneglect in a time-sensitive fashion, and that the degree of pseudoneglect in the line bisection task correlates with the average gaze position during visual exploration in a time-sensitive manner.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionTime PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttentionBiasFunctional LateralityHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultEye movementsLine bisectionPseudoneglectVisual exploration

Identifiers

PMID34218299
PMCPMC8448707
OpenAlexW3180971031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.