Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34218295›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021

Stem cells-derived natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: current protocols, feasibility, and benefits of ex vivo generated natural killer cells in treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Hamid Khodayari, Saeed Khodayari, Elmira Ebrahimi, Farimah Hadjilooei, Miko Vesovic, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh, Tomo Saric, Wilfried Stücker, Stefaan Van Gool, Jürgen Hescheler and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hamid Khodayari *International Center for Personalized Medicine (ICPM), 40235, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-7338
Saeed Khodayari *International Center for Personalized Medicine (ICPM), 40235, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elmira EbrahimiCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farimah HadjilooeiBreast Disease Research Center (BDRC), Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Miko VesovicInternational Center for Personalized Medicine (ICPM), 40235, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Habibollah MahmoodzadehBreast Disease Research Center (BDRC), Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hmahmoodzadeh@tums.ac.ir.
Tomo SaricInstitute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Wilfried StückerCologne Center for Immunoncology (IOZK), Cologne, Germany.
Stefaan Van GoolCologne Center for Immunoncology (IOZK), Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen HeschelerInstitute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Karim NayerniaInternational Center for Personalized Medicine (ICPM), 40235, Düsseldorf, Germany. nayernia@p7medicine.com.
Imam Khomeini Hospital · IRUniversity of Cologne · DEPE International (Germany) · DETehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapy provides a practical therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors (STs). This approach is adaptively conducted by the autologous and identical NK cells after in vitro expansion and overnight activation. However, the NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy has been faced with some fundamental and technical limitations. Moreover, the desirable outcomes of the NK cell therapy may not be achieved due to the complex tumor microenvironment by inhibition of intra-tumoral polarization and cytotoxicity of implanted NK cells. Currently, stem cells (SCs) technology provides a powerful opportunity to generate more effective and universal sources of the NK cells. Till now, several strategies have been developed to differentiate types of the pluripotent and adult SCs into the mature NK cells, with both feeder layer-dependent and/or feeder laye-free strategies. Higher cytokine production and intra-tumoral polarization capabilities as well as stronger anti-tumor properties are the main features of these SCs-derived NK cells. The present review article focuses on the principal barriers through the conventional NK cell immunotherapies for patients with advanced STs. It also provides a comprehensive resource of protocols regarding the generation of SCs-derived NK cells in an ex vivo condition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsStem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentCytokinesAdvanced solid tumorsCancerImmunotherapyNK cell therapyStem cells technology

Identifiers

PMID34218295
PMCPMC10992832
OpenAlexW3179524201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.