Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34217854›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology. Retina2022

Self-Supervised Feature Learning and Phenotyping for Assessing Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Retinal Fundus Images.

Baladitya Yellapragada, Sascha Hornauer, Kiersten Snyder, Stella Yu, Glenn Yiu

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baladitya YellapragadaDepartment of Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California; International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California; Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Sascha HornauerInternational Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California.
Kiersten SnyderDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Stella YuDepartment of Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California; International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California.
Glenn YiuDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California. Electronic address: gyiu@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Soft drusen in rhesus macaques as a nonhuman primate model of early age-related macular degenerationR01EY032238 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YIU, GLENN · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
A nanoparticle platform for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents to retinal pigment epithelial or choroidal endothelial cellsK08EY026101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YIU, GLENN · 2016 to 2020
$1.0M
Optogenetic Control of Oxidative Stress as a Model of Geographic AtrophyR21EY031108 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YIU, GLENN · 2019 to 2019
$312k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY026101NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032238NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are classified based on human rubrics that are prone to bias. Supervised neural networks trained using human-generated labels require labor-intensive annotations and are restricted to specific trained tasks. Here, we trained a self-supervised deep learning network using unlabeled fundus images, enabling data-driven feature classification of AMD severity and discovery of ocular phenotypes.

designDevelopment of a self-supervised training pipeline to evaluate fundus photographs from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).

participantsOne hundred thousand eight hundred forty-eight human-graded fundus images from 4757 AREDS participants between 55 and 80 years of age.

methodsWe trained a deep neural network with self-supervised Non-Parametric Instance Discrimination (NPID) using AREDS fundus images without labels then evaluated its performance in grading AMD severity using 2-step, 4-step, and 9-step classification schemes using a supervised classifier. We compared balanced and unbalanced accuracies of NPID against supervised-trained networks and ophthalmologists, explored network behavior using hierarchical learning of image subsets and spherical k-means clustering of feature vectors, then searched for ocular features that can be identified without labels.

main outcome measuresAccuracy and kappa statistics.

resultsNPID demonstrated versatility across different AMD classification schemes without re-training and achieved balanced accuracies comparable with those of supervised-trained networks or human ophthalmologists in classifying advanced AMD (82% vs. 81-92% or 89%), referable AMD (87% vs. 90-92% or 96%), or on the 4-step AMD severity scale (65% vs. 63-75% or 67%), despite never directly using these labels during self-supervised feature learning. Drusen area drove network predictions on the 4-step scale, while depigmentation and geographic atrophy (GA) areas correlated with advanced AMD classes. Self-supervised learning revealed grader-mislabeled images and susceptibility of some classes within more granular AMD scales to misclassification by both ophthalmologists and neural networks. Importantly, self-supervised learning enabled data-driven discovery of AMD features such as GA and other ocular phenotypes of the choroid (e.g., tessellated or blonde fundi), vitreous (e.g., asteroid hyalosis), and lens (e.g., nuclear cataracts) that were not predefined by human labels.

conclusionsSelf-supervised learning enables AMD severity grading comparable with that of ophthalmologists and supervised networks, reveals biases of human-defined AMD classification systems, and allows unbiased, data-driven discovery of AMD and non-AMD ocular phenotypes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinaAge-related macular degenerationAMDArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34217854
PMCPMC9482819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.