Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34217409›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine2021

Women's considerations and experiences for breast cancer screening and surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A focus group study.

Karen E Schifferdecker, Danielle Vaclavik, Karen J Wernli, Diana S M Buist, Karla Kerlikowske, Brian L Sprague, Louise M Henderson, Dianne Johnson, Jill Budesky, Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Breast cancer care amidst a pandemic: a scoping review to understand the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on health services and health outcomes.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E SchifferdeckerGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, United States of America. Electronic address: karen.e.schifferdecker@dartmouth.edu.
Danielle VaclavikGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, United States of America.
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, United States of America.
Diana S M BuistKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, United States of America.
Karla KerlikowskeUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Brian L SpragueUniversity of Vermont, United States of America.
Louise M HendersonUniversity of North Carolina, United States of America.
Dianne Johnsonpatient partners.
Jill Budeskypatient partners.
Gloria Jackson-Nefertitipatient partners.
Diana L MigliorettiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, United States of America; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, United States of America.
Anna N A TostesonGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, United States of America.
Dartmouth College · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USSeattle University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in numerous changes in delivery of healthcare services, including breast cancer screening and surveillance. Although facilities have implemented a number of strategies to provide services, women's thoughts and experiences related to breast cancer screening and surveillance during a pandemic are not well known. This focus group study with women across seven states recruited through the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium aims to remedy this gap in information. Thirty women ranging in age from 31 to 69 participated in five virtual focus groups, eight of whom had prior breast cancer. The first three focus groups covered a range of topics related to screening and surveillance during the pandemic while the last two groups covered experiences and then a review of sample communications to women about screening and surveillance during the pandemic to obtain reactions and recommendations. More than half of the women had screening or surveillance during the pandemic. Coding and analyses resulted in nine themes in three topic areas: decision factors, screening experiences, and preferred communications. Themes included weighing the risks of COVID-19 versus cancer; feelings that screening and surveillance were mostly safe but barriers may be heightened; feeling safe when undergoing screening but receiving a range of pandemic-specific communications from none to a lot; and wanting communications that are personalized, clear and concise. Based on these findings, providers and facilities should assure women of pandemic safety measures, review methods and content of communications, and assess for barriers to screening that may be amplified during the pandemic, including anxiety and access.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19Early Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID34217409
PMCPMC8721569
OpenAlexW3175650146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.