ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021
Precision and accuracy of pre-surgical planning of non-cemented total hip replacement with calibrated digital images and acetates.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Incontro, Alleanza, Responsabilita, Autonomia Intervention Model Combined with Orem Self-Care Model and the Use of Smart Wearable Devices on Perceived Stress and Self-Efficacy in Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Trial
- Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in orthopedic medical education: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Advantages and effectiveness of AI three-dimensional reconstruction technology in the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Statistical models and implant customization in hip arthroplasty: Seeking patient satisfaction through design.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Can machine learning predict the accuracy of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty, basing on patient-related factors? An explorative investigation on Supervised machine learning classification models.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Short-term outcome of artificial intelligence-assisted preoperative three-dimensional planning of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip compared to traditional surgery.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Accuracy analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip replacement.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in clinical practice: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Determining the accuracy of preoperative total hip replacement 2D templating using the mediCADJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Observational
- Pre-operative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen approaching a joint replacement procedure, pre-surgical planning is essential to predict an accurate estimation of implant size and position. There are currently two methods to achieve it, analog and digital. The present study aims to demonstrate how the hybrid technique is accurate and precise for pre-surgical planning in a non-cemented total hip replacement.
methodsConcordance-type study is used against a gold standard, as well as inter- and intra-observer consistency evaluation of two orthopedic surgeons and two orthopedic surgery residents. Accuracy was calculated with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Afterwards, the same calculation was done considering a margin of error with one size more and one less.
resultsThirty-eight patients were included in the study: 19 women and 19 men. Twenty-two prostheses (57.89%) were right-sided and 16 were left (42.11%). Twelve prostheses (31.57%) were Stryker and 26 Johnson & Johnson (68.43%). Acetabular cup correlation compared with the gold standard was moderate: ICC reported 0.45 (95% CI, 0.15-0.76). When adjusted by ± 1 size, ICC was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.18-0.79). On the other hand, results from the femoral stem reported ICC 0.85 (95% CI, 0.07-0.98). When adjusted by ± 1 size, ICC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.06-0.99).
conclusionsHybrid templating is a reliable substitute for analog or digital planning. It is quick, inexpensive, accurate, and better results are observed in the femoral component regardless the level of expertise of the evaluator. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.