Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34217287›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Socioeconomic differences in healthcare expenditure and utilization in The Netherlands.

Bette Loef, Iris Meulman, Gerrie-Cor M Herber, Geert Jan Kommer, Marc A Koopmanschap, Anton E Kunst, Johan J Polder, Albert Wong, Ellen Uiters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bette LoefNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. bette.loef@rivm.nl.
Iris MeulmanNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Gerrie-Cor M HerberNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan KommerNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Marc A KoopmanschapNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Anton E KunstAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan J PolderNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Albert WongNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ellen UitersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu This study was funded by the Strategic Program project "Zorgkloof" of the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, socioeconomic differences in health and use of healthcare resources have been reported, even in countries providing universal healthcare coverage. However, it is unclear how large these socioeconomic differences are for different types of care and to what extent health status plays a role. Therefore, our aim was to examine to what extent healthcare expenditure and utilization differ according to educational level and income, and whether these differences can be explained by health inequalities.

methodsData from 18,936 participants aged 25-79 years of the Dutch Health Interview Survey were linked at the individual level to nationwide claims data that included healthcare expenditure covered in 2017. For healthcare utilization, participants reported use of different types of healthcare in the past 12 months. The association of education/income with healthcare expenditure/utilization was studied separately for different types of healthcare such as GP and hospital care. Subsequently, analyses were adjusted for general health, physical limitations, and mental health.

resultsFor most types of healthcare, participants with lower educational and income levels had higher healthcare expenditure and used more healthcare compared to participants with the highest educational and income levels. Total healthcare expenditure was approximately between 50 and 150 % higher (depending on age group) among people in the lowest educational and income levels. These differences generally disappeared or decreased after including health covariates in the analyses. After adjustment for health, socioeconomic differences in total healthcare expenditure were reduced by 74-91 %.

conclusionsIn this study among Dutch adults, lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased healthcare expenditure and utilization. These socioeconomic differences largely disappeared after taking into account health status, which implies that, within the universal Dutch healthcare system, resources are being spent where they are most needed. Improving health among lower socioeconomic groups may contribute to decreasing health inequalities and healthcare spending.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresIncomeAdultDelivery of Health CareHealthcare DisparitiesHumansNetherlandsSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsEducationHealthHealthcare expenditureHealthcare utilizationIncomeSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID34217287
PMCPMC8254290
OpenAlexW3180820185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.