Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34217230›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2021

Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia.

Claudia M Groot Kormelinck, Charlotte F van Teunenbroek, Sytse U Zuidema, Martin Smalbrugge, Debby L Gerritsen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia M Groot KormelinckDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC FA21, P.O. Box 253, 9700, AD, Groningen, the Netherlands. c.m.groot.kormelinck@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-0738
Charlotte F van TeunenbroekDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC FA21, P.O. Box 253, 9700, AD, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sytse U ZuidemaDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC FA21, P.O. Box 253, 9700, AD, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Martin SmalbruggeDepartment of medicine for older people, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Debby L GerritsenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach.

methodsWe used Leontjevas' model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators.

resultsThe intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations' readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations.

conclusionsBarriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial.

Indexed as

DementiaNursing HomesHealth Services ResearchHumansPsychotropic DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesPsychotropic DrugsComplex interventionNeuropsychiatric symptomsNursing homeParticipatory action researchProcess evaluationPsychotropic drugs

Identifiers

PMID34217230
PMCPMC8254904
OpenAlexW3181027789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.