Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34217228›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Liquid biopsy as an option for predictive testing and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.

Alvida Qvick, Bianca Stenmark, Jessica Carlsson, Johan Isaksson, Christina Karlsson, Gisela Helenius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Impact of Liquid Biopsies Positive forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alvida QvickDept. of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev. Roseng., 701 85, Örebro, Sweden. alvida.qvick@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6688-947X
Bianca StenmarkDept. of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev. Roseng., 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
Jessica CarlssonDept. of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Johan IsakssonDept. of Respiratory Medicine, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden.
Christina KarlssonSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Gisela HeleniusDept. of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev. Roseng., 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of liquid biopsy as a primary source for variant analysis in lung cancer. In addition, we sought to characterize liquid biopsy variants and to correlate mutational load to clinical data.

methodsCirculating cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma from patients with lung cancer (n = 60) and controls with benign lung disease (n = 16). Variant analysis was performed using the AVENIO ctDNA Surveillance kit and the results were correlated to clinical and variant analysis data from tumor tissue or cytology retrieved from clinical routine diagnostics.

resultsThere were significantly more variants detected in lung cancer cases compared to controls (p = 0.011), but no difference between the histological subgroups of lung cancer was found (p = 0.465). Furthermore, significantly more variants were detected in patients with stage IIIb-IV disease compared to patients with stage I-IIIa (median 7 vs 4, p = 0.017). Plasma cfDNA mutational load was significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.010). The association persisted when adjusted for stage and ECOG performance status (HR: 3.64, 95% CI 1.37-9.67, p = 0.009). Agreement between tumor and plasma samples significantly differed with stage; patients with stage IIIb-IV disease showed agreement in 88.2% of the cases with clinically relevant variants, compared to zero cases in stage I-IIIa (p = 0.004). Furthermore, one variant in EGFR, two in KRAS, and one in BRAF were detected in plasma but not in tumor samples.

conclusionThis study concludes that in the vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients a reliable variant analysis can be performed using liquid biopsy from plasma. Furthermore, we found that the number of variants in plasma is associated with prognosis, possibly indicating a strategy for closer follow up on this crucial patient group.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID34217228
PMCPMC8254966
OpenAlexW3176360473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.