ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2021
Liquid biopsy as an option for predictive testing and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of liquid biopsy for genetic mutations determination in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review on literatures.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of state-of-the-art and future perspectives.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Pooled it
- Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Molecular profile of residual triple-negative breast cancer: opportunities for post-neoadjuvant therapeutic interventions.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and clinical outcome prediction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Rare sequential EGFR and ALK mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lung Diseases Using Plasma Glycosaminoglycans and Cell-Free DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Circulating tumour DNA analysis for early detection of lung cancer: a systematic review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Values of circulating tumor DNA for non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, progress and challenges: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Article
- A comparative study on ctDNA and tumor DNA mutations in lung cancer and benign cases with a high number of CTCs and CTECs.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- The Contribution of Mediastinal Transbronchial Nodal Cryobiopsy to Morpho-Histological and Molecular Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Impact of Liquid Biopsies Positive forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Synggen: fast and data-driven generation of synthetic heterogeneous NGS cancer data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- NTRK-fusions in pediatric thyroid tumors: Current state and future perspectives.Cancer genetics · 2022Review
- Biological and technical factors in the assessment of blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB) in patients with NSCLC.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA testing for the detection of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- NTRK Fusion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and TRK Inhibitor Resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of liquid biopsy as a primary source for variant analysis in lung cancer. In addition, we sought to characterize liquid biopsy variants and to correlate mutational load to clinical data.
methodsCirculating cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma from patients with lung cancer (n = 60) and controls with benign lung disease (n = 16). Variant analysis was performed using the AVENIO ctDNA Surveillance kit and the results were correlated to clinical and variant analysis data from tumor tissue or cytology retrieved from clinical routine diagnostics.
resultsThere were significantly more variants detected in lung cancer cases compared to controls (p = 0.011), but no difference between the histological subgroups of lung cancer was found (p = 0.465). Furthermore, significantly more variants were detected in patients with stage IIIb-IV disease compared to patients with stage I-IIIa (median 7 vs 4, p = 0.017). Plasma cfDNA mutational load was significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.010). The association persisted when adjusted for stage and ECOG performance status (HR: 3.64, 95% CI 1.37-9.67, p = 0.009). Agreement between tumor and plasma samples significantly differed with stage; patients with stage IIIb-IV disease showed agreement in 88.2% of the cases with clinically relevant variants, compared to zero cases in stage I-IIIa (p = 0.004). Furthermore, one variant in EGFR, two in KRAS, and one in BRAF were detected in plasma but not in tumor samples.
conclusionThis study concludes that in the vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients a reliable variant analysis can be performed using liquid biopsy from plasma. Furthermore, we found that the number of variants in plasma is associated with prognosis, possibly indicating a strategy for closer follow up on this crucial patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.