Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216815›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2021

Alternative dosing of exemestane in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Design and methods of a randomized presurgical trial.

Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Davide Serrano, Parjhitham Thomas, Katherine D Crew, Nagi B Kumar, Sara Gandini, Lana A Vornik, Jack Lee, Sara Cagnacci, Elisa Vicini and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Aliana Guerrieri-GonzagaEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Davide SerranoEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: davide.serrano@ieo.it.
Parjhitham ThomasUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Katherine D CrewColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nagi B KumarMoffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Sara GandiniEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Lana A VornikUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jack LeeUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sara CagnacciEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Elisa ViciniEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Chiara A AccorneroEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mauro D'AmicoOspedali Galliera Genoa, Italy.
Flavio GuasoneOspedale Villa Scassi ASL3, Genoa, Italy.
Stefano SpinaciOspedale Villa Scassi ASL3, Genoa, Italy.
Tania B WebberOspedali Galliera Genoa, Italy.
Powel H BrownUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eva SzaboDivision of Cancer Prevention, NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brandy Heckman-StoddardDivision of Cancer Prevention, NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bernardo BonanniEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · USEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAromatase inhibitors are effective in lowering breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women, but adverse events represent a barrier to their acceptability and adherence as a preventive treatment. This study aims to assess whether lowering exemestane schedule may retain biological activity while improving tolerability in breast cancer patients. METHODS/

designWe are conducting a, pre-surgical, non-inferiority phase IIb study in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Participants are randomized to receive either exemestane 25 mg/day or 25 mg/three times-week or once a week for 4 to 6 weeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint is the percentage change of serum estradiol concentration between baseline and surgery comparing the three arms. Sample size of 180 women was calculated assuming a 6% non-inferiority of the percent change of estradiol in the lower dose arms compared with the 80% decrease predicted in the full dose arm, with 80% power and using a one-sided 5% significance level and a two-sample t-test. Main secondary outcomes are: safety; change in Ki-67 in cancer and adjacent pre-cancer tissue, circulating sex hormones, adipokines, lipid profile, insulin and glucose changes, in correlation with drug and metabolites concentrations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The present paper is focused on methodology and operational aspects of the study. A total of 180 participants have ben enrolled. The trial is still blinded, and the analyses are ongoing. Despite the short term duration, results may have relevant implications for clinical management of women at increased risk of developing a ER positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAndrostadienesAromatase InhibitorsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansPostmenopauseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrostadienesAromatase InhibitorsexemestaneBreast cancerDrug schedule and alternative doseExemestanePhase II studyPreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID34216815
PMCPMC8429140
OpenAlexW3180333991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.