Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216559›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2021

Expected Organizational Costs for Inserting Prevalence Information Into Lumbar Spine Imaging Reports.

Brian W Bresnahan, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Eric N Meier, Kathryn T James, Laura S Gold, Sean D Rundell, Judith A Turner, Pradeep Suri, Patrick H Luetmer, Janna L Friedly and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Brian W BresnahanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: bres@uw.edu.
Jeffrey G JarvikDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Eric N MeierDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kathryn T JamesDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Laura S GoldDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Sean D RundellComparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Judith A TurnerComparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Pradeep SuriRehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Patrick H LuetmerDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Janna L FriedlyComparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Karen J ShermanKaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Andrew L AvinsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Brent D GriffithDiagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Larry G KesslerDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
UW Core Center for Clinical Research of Musculoskeletal ConditionsP30AR072572 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JEFFREY G JARVIK, Pradeep Suri · 2017 to 2026
$8.3M
A Pragmatic Trial of Lumbar Image Reporting with Epidemiology (LIRE)UH3AR066795 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JARVIK, JEFFREY G · 2014 to 2017
$6.0M
A Pragmatic Trial of Lumbar Image Reporting with Epidemiology (LIRE)UH2AT007766 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JARVIK, JEFFREY G · 2012 to 2012
$838k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT007766NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072572NIAMS NIH HHS UH3 AR066795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifying physician behavior to more closely align with guideline-based care can be challenging. Few effective strategies resulting in appropriate spine-related health care have been reported. The Lumbar Imaging With Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE) intervention did not result in reductions in spine care but did in opioid prescriptions written.

objectivesTo estimate organizational resource needs and costs associated with implementing a pragmatic, decision support-type intervention that inserted age- and modality-matched prevalence information for common lumbar spine imaging findings, using site-based resource use data from the LIRE trial. RESEARCH

designTime and cost estimation associated with implementing the LIRE intervention in a health organization. SUBJECTS: Providers and patients assessed in the LIRE trial. MEASURES: Expected personnel costs required to implement the LIRE intervention.

resultsAnnual salaries were converted to daily average per person costs, ranging from $400 to $2,200 per day (base case) for personnel (range: $300-$2,600). Estimated total average cost for implementing LIRE was $5,009 (range: $2,651-$12,020), including conducting pilot testing with providers. Costs associated with a small amount of time for a radiologist (6-12 hours) and imaging-ordering providers (1-8 hours each) account for approximately 75% of the estimated total cost.

conclusionsThe process of implementing an intervention for lumbar spine imaging reports containing age- and modality-appropriate epidemiological benchmarks for common imaging findings required radiologists, imaging-ordering providers, information technology specialists, and limited testing and monitoring. The LIRE intervention seems to be a relatively low-cost, evidence-based, complementary tool that can be easily integrated into the reporting of spine imaging.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionAnalgesics, OpioidCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansPrevalenceAnalgesics, OpioidCostsimagingimplementationopioidsspine

Identifiers

PMID34216559
PMCPMC9674370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.