ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2021
Targeted long-read sequencing identifies missing disease-causing variation.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
156 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting pathogenic structural variation in families with undiagnosed rare disease in a national genome project.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Resolving missing human polymorphic inversions and other complex variants from ultralong read data.Genome research · 2026Article
- Somatic mosaicism in the brain: linking development, ageing and neurodegeneration.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Nanopore Ultra-Long Sequencing for FSHD: From Molecular Diagnosis to Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Genes · 2026Review
- Cost-efficient long-read trio-barcoded adaptive sequencing improves rare disease diagnosis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-Read Sequencing in CKD Diagnostics: Breaking Genomic Barriers and Expanding Global Inclusion.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- Unraveling missing variants through target capture-based long-read sequencing in autosomal recessive disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Benchmarking long-read variant sensitivity across ONT and PacBio platforms using known clinically reported variants in a cohort of critically ill newborns.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Structural variant discovery and diagnostic impact in rare diseases from short-read and long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- From fragments to full pictures: how long-read sequencing platforms are revolutionizing oncology research.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Diagnosis complexity of dentinogenesis imperfecta involvingJournal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Determinants of haplotype phasing accuracy in long-read human genome sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genome-wide detection and clinical prioritization of tandem repeat outliers using long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Targeted long-read RNA sequencing for rare disease diagnosis and variant interpretation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Long-read analysis of tetrameric microsatellites with vmwhere supports GGAA repeat length-dependent chromatin state association in Ewing sarcoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Expanding the genetic landscape of inherited metabolic diseases using long-read sequencing and transcriptomic profiling.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Identification of de novo variants from parent-proband duos via long-read sequencing.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- The Tale of the Guanosine Tract in Repeat Expansion Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Long-read Sequencing in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology science · 2026Review
- Using the linear references from the pangenome to discover missing autism variants.Nature communications · 2026Article
96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite widespread clinical genetic testing, many individuals with suspected genetic conditions lack a precise diagnosis, limiting their opportunity to take advantage of state-of-the-art treatments. In some cases, testing reveals difficult-to-evaluate structural differences, candidate variants that do not fully explain the phenotype, single pathogenic variants in recessive disorders, or no variants in genes of interest. Thus, there is a need for better tools to identify a precise genetic diagnosis in individuals when conventional testing approaches have been exhausted. We performed targeted long-read sequencing (T-LRS) using adaptive sampling on the Oxford Nanopore platform on 40 individuals, 10 of whom lacked a complete molecular diagnosis. We computationally targeted up to 151 Mbp of sequence per individual and searched for pathogenic substitutions, structural variants, and methylation differences using a single data source. We detected all genomic aberrations-including single-nucleotide variants, copy number changes, repeat expansions, and methylation differences-identified by prior clinical testing. In 8/8 individuals with complex structural rearrangements, T-LRS enabled more precise resolution of the mutation, leading to changes in clinical management in one case. In ten individuals with suspected Mendelian conditions lacking a precise genetic diagnosis, T-LRS identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in six and variants of uncertain significance in two others. T-LRS accurately identifies pathogenic structural variants, resolves complex rearrangements, and identifies Mendelian variants not detected by other technologies. T-LRS represents an efficient and cost-effective strategy to evaluate high-priority genes and regions or complex clinical testing results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.