Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216460›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2021

Growth of 19 conifer species is highly sensitive to winter warming, spring frost and summer drought.

Yanjun Song, Ute Sass-Klaassen, Frank Sterck, Leo Goudzwaard, Linar Akhmetzyanov, Lourens Poorter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanjun SongForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Ute Sass-KlaassenForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Frank SterckForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Leo GoudzwaardForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Linar AkhmetzyanovForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Lourens PoorterForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsConifers are key components of many temperate and boreal forests and are important for forestry, but species differences in stem growth responses to climate are still poorly understood and may hinder effective management of these forests in a warmer and drier future.

methodsWe studied 19 Northern Hemisphere conifer species planted in a 50-year-old common garden experiment in the Netherlands to (1) assess the effect of temporal dynamics in climate on stem growth, (2) test for a possible positive relationship between the growth potential and climatic growth sensitivity across species, and (3) evaluate the extent to which stem growth is controlled by phylogeny. KEY

resultsEighty-nine per cent of the species showed a significant reduction in stem growth to summer drought, 37 % responded negatively to spring frost and 32 % responded positively to higher winter temperatures. Species differed largely in their growth sensitivity to climatic variation and showed, for example, a four-fold difference in growth reduction to summer drought. Remarkably, we did not find a positive relationship between productivity and climatic sensitivity, but instead observed that some species combined a low growth sensitivity to summer drought with high growth potential. Both growth sensitivity to climate and growth potential were partly phylogenetically controlled.

conclusionsA warmer and drier future climate is likely to reduce the productivity of most conifer species. We did not find a relationship between growth potential and growth sensitivity to climate; instead, some species combined high growth potential with low sensitivity to summer drought. This may help forest managers to select productive species that are able to cope with a warmer and drier future.

Indexed as

DroughtsTracheophytaClimate ChangeForestsSeasonsTreesConifer speciesgrowth potentialgrowth sensitivityphylogenyspring frostsummer droughtwinter temperature

Identifiers

PMID34216460
PMCPMC8422889
OpenAlexW3178770123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.