ArticleThe oncologist2021
Province-Wide Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the clinical, humanistic, and economic impact of early cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the literature on the occurrence and characteristics of dyspnea in oncology patients.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2023Pooled it
- Real-world implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in routine oncology practice: a scoping review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Duration of systemic therapy in patients with metastaticTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Survivorship Challenges and Supportive Care in Lung Cancer.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Trends in symptom severity and complexity in patients undergoing radiation therapy.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A population-based analysis of the management of symptoms of depression among patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Ontario, Canada.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Common and distinct risk factors that influence more severe and distressing shortness of breath profiles in oncology outpatients.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing Symptom Screening and Patient Education Among Patients with Metastatic Lung Cancer: a Qualitative Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on lung cancer symptom burden: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Higher Lifetime Stress and Symptom Burden Contribute to the Occurrence of Shortness of Breath.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Systematic symptom screening in patients with advanced cancer treated in certified oncology centers: results of the prospective multicenter German KeSBa project.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Pain and Interventions in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Province-Wide Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Dyspnea in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis of disease burden and patterns of care.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Epidemiology, Patients' Journey and Healthcare Costs in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Real-World Evidence Analysis in Italy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Days at home in the last three months of life: patterns-of-care analysis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Ontario, Canada, patient-reported outcome (PRO) evaluation through the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) has been integrated into clinical workflow since 2007. As stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with substantial disease and treatment-related morbidity, this province-wide study investigated moderate to severe symptom burden in this population. MATERIALS AND
methodsESAS collected from patients with stage IV NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2018 linked to the Ontario provincial health care system database were studied. ESAS acquired within 12 months following diagnosis were analyzed and the proportion reporting moderate to severe scores (ESAS ≥4) in each domain was calculated. Predictors of moderate to severe scores were identified using multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance.
resultsOf 22,799 patients, 13,289 (58.3%) completed ESAS (84,373 assessments) in the year following diagnosis. Patients with older age, with high comorbidity, and not receiving active cancer therapy had lower ESAS completion. The majority (94.4%) reported at least one moderate to severe symptom. The most prevalent were tiredness (84.1%), low well-being (80.7%), low appetite (71.7%), and shortness of breath (67.8%). Most symptoms peaked at diagnosis and, while declining, remained high in the following year. On multivariable analyses, comorbidity, low income, nonimmigrants, and urban residency were associated with moderate to severe symptoms. Moderate to severe scores in all ESAS domains aside from anxiety were associated with radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior, whereas drowsiness, low appetite and well-being, nausea, and tiredness were associated with systemic therapy within 2 weeks prior.
conclusionThis province-wide PRO analysis showed moderate to severe symptoms were prevalent and persistent among patients with metastatic NSCLC, underscoring the need to address supportive measures in this population especially around treatments. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this largest study of lung cancer patient-reported outcomes (PROs), stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients had worse moderate-to-severe symptoms than other metastatic malignancies such as breast or gastrointestinal cancers when assessed with similar methodology. Prevalence of moderate-to-severe symptoms peaked early and remained high during the first year of follow-up. Symptom burden was associated with recent radiation and systemic treatments. Early and sustained PRO collection is important to detect actionable symptom progression, especially around treatments. Vulnerable patients (e.g., older, high comorbidity) who face barriers in attending in-person clinic visits had lower PRO completion. Virtual PRO collection may improve completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.