Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216413›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

A 10-Item Frailty Index Based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA-10) in Older Adults with Cancer: Development and Construct Validation.

Tomohiro F Nishijima, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Taito Esaki, Masaru Morita, Yasushi Toh, Hyman B Muss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FI-CGA and eFI-CGA in Frailty Care: a Scoping Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Development of a Leg And Walking Self-exercise (LAWS) program for older adults during cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  12. Diagnosis of frailty and implications on surgical process in the elderly: A narrative review.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Frailty.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomohiro F NishijimaGeriatric Oncology Service, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-7762
Mototsugu ShimokawaCancer Biostatistics Laboratory, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taito EsakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masaru MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasushi TohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hyman B MussDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA frailty index (FI) based on domain-level deficits identified through a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been previously developed and validated in general geriatric patients. Our objectives were to construct an FI-CGA and to assess its construct validity in the geriatric oncology setting.

methodsFive hundred forty consecutive Japanese patients with cancer who underwent a CGA on a geriatric oncology service were included (median age 80 years, range 66-96 years). We developed a 10-item frailty index based on deficits in 10 domains (FI-CGA-10): cognition, mood, communication, mobility, balance, nutrition, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social support, and comorbidity. Deficits in each domain were scored as 0 (no problem), 0.5 (minor problem), and 1.0 (major problem). Scores were calculated by dividing the sum of the scores for each domain by 10 and then categorized as fit (<0.2), pre-frail (0.2-0.35), and frail (>0.35). Construct validity was tested by correlating the FI-CGA-10 with other established frailty measures.

resultsFI-CGA-10 was well approximated by the gamma distribution. Overall, 20% of patients were fit, 41% were pre-frail, and 39% were frail. FI-CGA-10 was correlated with Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) Clinical Frailty Scale (r = 0.83), CSHA rules-based frailty definition (r = 0.67), and CSHA Function Score (r = 0.77). Increasing levels of frailty were significantly associated with functional and cognitive impairments, high comorbidity burden, poor self-rated health, and low estimated survival probabilities.

conclusionThe FI-CGA-10 is a user-friendly and construct-validated measure for quantifying frailty from a CGA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article describes the construction of a user-friendly 10-item frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA-10) for older adults with cancer: cognition, mood, communication, mobility, balance, nutrition, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social support, and comorbidity. The FI-CGA-10 simplifies the original FI-CGA used in the general geriatric setting while maintaining its content validity. The index's construct validity was demonstrated in a cohort of older adults with various cancer types. The advantage of the FI-CGA-10 is that a frailty score can be calculated more readily and interpreted in a more clinically sensible manner than the original FI-CGA.

Indexed as

FrailtyNeoplasmsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansComprehensive geriatric assessmentConstruct validationFrailtyFrailty indexOlder adults with cancer

Identifiers

PMID34216413
PMCPMC8488765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.