Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216364›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2021

Patient Positioning for Proximal Femur Fracture Fixation: a Review of Best Practices.

Khushdeep S Vig, Curtis Adams, Joseph R Young, Eric Perloff, Casey M O'Connor, Cory M Czajka

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Does supine versus lateral position affect operative time and reduction quality for elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khushdeep S Vig *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA.
Curtis AdamsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA.
Joseph R Young *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA.
Eric Perloff *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA.
Casey M O'ConnorDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA. oconnoc1@mail.amc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9376-9801
Cory M Czajka *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Road, Albany, NY, USA.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewProximal femur fractures are common traumatic injuries treated by orthopedic surgeons. Preparation and positioning for surgical intervention are critical in the proper management of proximal femur fractures. The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence on the various positioning options for patients and to highlight the principles and emerging techniques to help orthopedic surgeons treat this common injury. RECENT

findingsStrategic patient positioning is key to the reduction and fixation of proximal femur fractures without complications. The use of intramedullary devices for the fixation of proximal femur fractures has led to an increased use of the modern fracture table. The fracture table should be used when surgeons are facile with its use to avoid significant complications. Recent best available evidence has suggested increased risk of malrotation associated with the use of the fracture table. The use of the radiolucent table offers the most flexibility, but limits surgeons as multiple assistants are needed to maintain reduction during fixation. Positioning for proximal femur fractures is an important technique for general and trauma orthopedic surgeons. Surgeons need to be aware of the various techniques for positioning of proximal femur fractures due to the diversity of injury patterns and patient characteristics. Each positioning technique has it benefits and potential complications that every orthopaedic surgeon should be familiar with while treating these injuries.

Indexed as

Hip fracturePatient positioningProximal femur fracture

Identifiers

PMID34216364
PMCPMC8390611
OpenAlexW3173177674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.