ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022
Femorotibial alignment measured during robotic assisted knee surgery is reliable: radiologic and gait analysis.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knee kinesiography in 2026: Current and future applications for digital orthopaedics and personalised total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Comparison between passive knee kinematics during surgery and active knee kinematics during walking: A preliminary study.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFemorotibial alignment is crucial for the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Robotic-assisted systems are useful to increase the accuracy of alignment in UKA. However, no study has assessed if the femorotibial alignment measured by the image-free robotic system is reliable. The aim of this study was to determine whether measurement of the mechanical femorotibial axis (mFTA) in the coronal plane with handheld robotic assistance during surgery is equivalent to a static measurement on radiographs and to a dynamic measurement during walking.
methodsTwenty patients scheduled for robotic-assisted medial UKA using handheld technology were included in this prospective study. Three measurements of the frontal femorotibial axis were compared: intra-operative acquisition by computer assistance (dynamic, non-weightbearing position), radiographic measurements on long leg X-ray (static, weightbearing position), and by gait analysis during walking (dynamic, weightbearing position).
resultsThere was no significant difference in the mFTA between computer (174.4 ± 3.4°), radiological (173.9 ± 3.3°), and gait analysis (172.9 ± 5.1°) measurements (p = 0.5). There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.6577355, p = 0.0016) between robotic-assisted measurements and gait analysis.
conclusionThere was no significant difference in the femorotibial axis measured by the image-free robotic assistance, from the preoperative radiographs or by gait analysis. The reliability of intra-operative measurements of the frontal femorotibial axis by these robotic-assisted systems is acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34216259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.