ReviewThe oncologist2021
Plasma Cell-Free DNA Genotyping: From an Emerging Concept to a Standard-of-Care Tool in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Tumour to Bloodstream: Advancing PD-L1 Testing With Liquid Biopsies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Review
- The Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Utilization in Australasia: A Survey of Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia Members.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- From Lab to Clinic: Artificial Intelligence with Spectroscopic Liquid Biopsies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Lebanon: focus on ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- The Importance of Biomarker Testing in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Podcast.Oncology and therapy · 2024Article
- Molecular response assessment using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in advanced solid tumors.British journal of cancer · 2023Review
- Cell-Free MethylatedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multiplex Digital Methylation-Specific PCR for Noninvasive Screening of Lung Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Could DNA Fragments Be the Key to Early Detection of Lung Cancer?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Current and future applications of liquid biopsy in non-small-cell lung cancer-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- Liquid Biopsies in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Advances in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer harbouringTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping is an alternative to tissue genotyping, particularly when tissue specimens are insufficient or unavailable, and provides critical information that can be used to guide treatment decisions in managing patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this article, we review the evolution of plasma cfDNA genotyping from an emerging concept, through development of analytical methods, to its clinical applications as a standard-of-care tool in NSCLC. The number of driver or resistance mutations recommended for testing in NSCLC continues to increase. Because of the expanding list of therapeutically relevant variants, comprehensive testing to investigate larger regions of multiple genes in a single run is often preferable and saves on time and cost, compared with performing serial single-gene assays. Recent advances in nucleic acid next-generation sequencing have led to a rapid expansion in cfDNA genotyping technologies. Analytic assays that have received regulatory approval are now routinely used as diagnostic companions in the setting of metastatic NSCLC. As the demand for plasma-based technologies increases, more regulatory approvals of cfDNA genotyping assays are expected in the future. Plasma cfDNA genotyping is currently aiding oncologists in the delivery of personalized care by facilitating matching of patients with targeted therapy and monitoring emergence of resistance to therapy in NSCLC. Further advances currently underway to increase assay sensitivity and specificity will potentially expand the use of plasma cfDNA genotyping in early cancer detection, monitoring response to therapy, detection of minimal residual disease, and measurement of tumor mutational burden in NSCLC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping offers an alternative to tissue genotyping, particularly when tissue specimens are insufficient or unavailable. Advances in cfDNA genotyping technologies have led to analytic assays that are now routinely used to aid oncologists in the delivery of personalized care by facilitating matching of patients with targeted therapy and monitoring emergence of resistance to therapy. Further advances underway to increase assay sensitivity and specificity will potentially expand the use of plasma cfDNA genotyping in early cancer detection, monitoring response to therapy, detection of minimal residual disease, and evaluation of tumor mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.