Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216116›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2021

Microbiological testing of clinical samples before and after periodontal treatment. A comparative methodological study between real-time PCR and real-time-PCR associated to propidium monoazide.

Maria Sereti, Alkisti Zekeridou, Jose Cancela, Andrea Mombelli, Catherine Giannopoulou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation betweenFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. qPCR Detection and Quantification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria SeretiDivision of Regenerative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9694-5812
Alkisti ZekeridouDivision of Regenerative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9468-8958
Jose CancelaDivision of Regenerative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrea MombelliDivision of Regenerative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Catherine GiannopoulouDivision of Regenerative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the present methodological study was to evaluate the discrepancies in the detection of a number of periodontally involved pathogenic bacteria obtained from clinical samples by two methods: the quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) and the qPCR combined with pre-treatment by Propidium Monoazide (PMA). MATERIAL AND

methodsPlaque and saliva samples were obtained from 30 subjects: 20 subjects with chronic or aggressive periodontitis in need of periodontal therapy with or without antibiotics and 10 subjects in Supportive Periodontal Treatment (SPT). The clinical samples taken before treatment (BL) and 1 month later (M1), were divided in two aliquots: one was immediately treated with PMA while the other was left untreated. All samples were further analyzed with qPCR after DNA extraction, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Parvimonas micra (Pm), and Prevotella intermedia (Pi).

resultsLarge inter-individual variations were observed in the concentration of the studied bacteria. At both instances (BL and M1) and for the three groups, significantly lower counts of bacteria were depicted when plaque and saliva samples were pre-treated with PMA as compared to those without treatment. Treatment resulted in significant decreases in the number of bacteria, mainly in the plaque samples. However, these changes were almost similar in the three groups independently of the method of detection used (PMA-qPCR vs. q-PCR).

conclusionRemoval of DNA from non-viable cells with PMA treatment is an easily applied step added to the classical qPCR that could give accurate information on the presence of viable bacterial load and evaluate the response to periodontal treatment.

Indexed as

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitansAzidesHumansPropidiumReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAzidesPropidiumpropidium monoazidebacteriaperiodontal treatmentplaquepropidium monoazideRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID34216116
PMCPMC8638278
OpenAlexW3175991491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.