Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34216045›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2021

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults mental health services: A mixed methods study.

Rohan Bhome, Jonathan Huntley, Christian Dalton-Locke, Norha Vera San Juan, Sian Oram, Una Foye, Gill Livingston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health workforce: A rapid review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nursing Home Workers' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in France.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rohan BhomeQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan HuntleyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6304-6231
Christian Dalton-LockeNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Norha Vera San JuanNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sian OramNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Una FoyeMental Health Nursing and NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on older adults mental health care. Our study aimed to explore staff perspectives on key challenges and innovations in order to help inform the delivery of older adults mental health care in subsequent waves of the pandemic.

methodsA mixed methods online questionnaire developed by National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit was used to gather staff perspectives on their challenges at work, problems faced by service users and their carers, and sources of help and support. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative analysis and descriptive content analysis for qualitative analysis.

results158 participants, working in either community or inpatient settings, and from a range of professional disciplines, were included. For inpatient staff, a significant challenge was infection control. In the community, staff identified a lack of access to physical and social care as well as reduced contact with friends and families as being challenges for patients. Remote working was seen as a positive innovation along with COVID-19 related guidance from various sources and peer support.

conclusionOur study, with a focus on staff and patient well-being, helps to inform service development for future waves of the pandemic. We discuss measures to improve infection control in inpatient settings, the role of voluntary organisations in supporting socially isolated community patients, the need for better integration of physical and mental health services at an organisational level, and the importance of training staff to support patients and their families with end of life planning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesAgedCaregiversHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19dementia caremental health servicesmental health staffolder adults mental healthpandemic

Identifiers

PMID34216045
PMCPMC8420103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.