Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215923›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

EANM guideline on the role of 2-[

Roberto C Delgado Bolton, Nicolas Aide, Patrick M Colletti, Annamaria Ferrero, Diana Paez, Andrea Skanjeti, Francesco Giammarile

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Value of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Comparative analysis ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dual-receptor PET imaging of ovarian cancer using aAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Predicting Complete Cytoreduction with Preoperative [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Roberto C Delgado BoltonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Logroño, Spain. rbiolton@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8071-6513
Nicolas AideDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-0847
Patrick M CollettiDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-8046
Annamaria FerreroAcademic Division Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Torino, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-3699
Diana PaezNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9268-0979
Andrea SkanjetiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-7116
Francesco GiammarileNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-7893
International Atomic Energy Agency · ATA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITHospital San Pedro · ESInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most patients with ovarian carcinoma, the diagnosis is reached when the disease is long past the initial stages, presenting already an advanced stage, and they usually have a very bad prognosis. Cytoreductive or debulking surgical procedures, platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted agents are key therapeutic elements. However, around 7 out of 10 patients present recurrent disease within 36 months from the initial diagnosis. The metastatic spread in ovarian cancer follows three pathways: contiguous dissemination across the peritoneum, dissemination through the lymphatic drainage and, although less importantly in this case, through the bloodstream. Radiological imaging, including ultrasound, CT and MRI, are the main imaging techniques in which management decisions are supported, CT being considered the best available technique for presurgical evaluation and staging purposes. Regarding 2-[

Indexed as

Nuclear EnergyNuclear MedicineOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMolecular ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsUnited StatesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDGClinical indicationsGuidelineImagingOvarian cancerPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID34215923
OpenAlexW3174873861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.