Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215865›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2021

Testing physiologically relevant conditions in minimal inhibitory concentration assays.

Corrie R Belanger, Robert E W Hancock

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sphingosine synergizes with polymyxin antibiotics againstMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. A digital droplet microarray for measuring tolerance to antibiotics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biology of novel LpxC inhibitors forMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A conserved KL2-capsule-related phage-resistant mechanism in carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial Peptide-Peptoid Macrocycles from the Polymyxin B2 Chemical Space.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Corrie R BelangerCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-5508
Robert E W HancockCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. bob@hancocklab.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-8503

Funding

CIHR FDN-154287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay uses agar or broth dilution methods to measure, under defined test conditions, the lowest effective concentration of an antimicrobial agent that inhibits visible growth of a bacterium of interest. This assay is used to test the susceptibilities of bacterial isolates and of novel antimicrobial drugs, and is typically done in nutrient-rich laboratory media that have little relevance to in vivo conditions. As an extension to our original protocol on MIC assays (also published in Nature Protocols), here we describe the application of the MIC broth microdilution assay to test antimicrobial susceptibility in conditions that are more physiologically relevant to infections observed in the clinic. Specifically, we describe a platform that can be applied to the preparation of medium that mimics lung and wound exudate or blood conditions for the growth and susceptibility testing of bacteria, including ESKAPE pathogens. This protocol can also be applied to most physiologically relevant liquid medium and aerobic pathogens, and takes 3-4 d to complete.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCulture MediaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpectrophotometryTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture Media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.