Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Statistical and machine learning methods for analysis of multiplex protein data from a novel proximity extension assay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Emil Maag, Archana Kulasingam, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Kamilla Sofie Pedersen, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Anne-Mette Hvas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emil MaagBioXpedia A/S, Palle Juul-Jensens, Blvd 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Archana KulasingamDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Erik Lerkevang GroveDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. erikgrove@dadlnet.dk.
Kamilla Sofie PedersenBioXpedia A/S, Palle Juul-Jensens, Blvd 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Steen Dalby KristensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Anne-Mette HvasDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), we explored how machine learning methods can be used for analysing multiplex protein data obtained from proximity extension assays. Blood samples were obtained from 48 STEMI-patients at admission and after three months. A subset of patients also had blood samples obtained at four and 12 h after admission. Multiplex protein data were obtained using a proximity extension assay. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive power and importance of biomarkers to distinguish between the acute and the stable phase. The similarity of response profiles was investigated using K-means clustering. Out of 92 proteins, 26 proteins were found to significantly distinguish the acute and the stable phase following STEMI. The five proteins tissue factor pathway inhibitor, azurocidin, spondin-1, myeloperoxidase and myoglobin were found to be highly important for differentiating between the acute and the stable phase. Four of these proteins shared response profiles over the four time-points. Machine learning methods can be used to identify and assess novel predictive biomarkers as showcased in the present study population of patients with STEMI.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersBlood ProteinsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSupervised Machine LearningBiomarkersBlood Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34215806
PMCPMC8253786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.