Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215765›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

An empirical investigation of deviations from the Beer-Lambert law in optical estimation of lactate.

M Mamouei, K Budidha, N Baishya, M Qassem, P A Kyriacou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On photokinetics under polychromatic light.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Rubber-like elasticity in laser-driven free surface flow of a Newtonian fluid.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M MamoueiDeep Medicine, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Oxford Martin School, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. mohammad.mamouei@wrh.ox.ac.uk.
K BudidhaResearch Centre for Biomedical Engineering (RCBE), School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
N BaishyaResearch Centre for Biomedical Engineering (RCBE), School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
M QassemResearch Centre for Biomedical Engineering (RCBE), School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
P A KyriacouResearch Centre for Biomedical Engineering (RCBE), School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linear relationship between optical absorbance and the concentration of analytes-as postulated by the Beer-Lambert law-is one of the fundamental assumptions that much of the optical spectroscopy literature is explicitly or implicitly based upon. The common use of linear regression models such as principal component regression and partial least squares exemplifies how the linearity assumption is upheld in practical applications. However, the literature also establishes that deviations from the Beer-Lambert law can be expected when (a) the light source is far from monochromatic, (b) the concentrations of analytes are very high and (c) the medium is highly scattering. The lack of a quantitative understanding of when such nonlinearities can become predominant, along with the mainstream use of nonlinear machine learning models in different fields, have given rise to the use of methods such as random forests, support vector regression, and neural networks in spectroscopic applications. This raises the question that, given the small number of samples and the high number of variables in many spectroscopic datasets, are nonlinear effects significant enough to justify the additional model complexity? In the present study, we empirically investigate this question in relation to lactate, an important biomarker. Particularly, to analyze the effects of scattering matrices, three datasets were generated by varying the concentration of lactate in phosphate buffer solution, human serum, and sheep blood. Additionally, the fourth dataset pertained to invivo, transcutaneous spectra obtained from healthy volunteers in an exercise study. Linear and nonlinear models were fitted to each dataset and measures of model performance were compared to attest the assumption of linearity. To isolate the effects of high concentrations, the phosphate buffer solution dataset was augmented with six samples with very high concentrations of lactate between (100-600 mmol/L). Subsequently, three partly overlapping datasets were extracted with lactate concentrations varying between 0-11, 0-20 and 0-600 mmol/L. Similarly, the performance of linear and nonlinear models were compared in each dataset. This analysis did not provide any evidence of substantial nonlinearities due high concentrations. However, the results suggest that nonlinearities may be present in scattering media, justifying the use of complex, nonlinear models.

Identifiers

PMID34215765
PMCPMC8253732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.