Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Radiomics models based on enhanced computed tomography to distinguish clear cell from non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas.

Ping Wang, Xu Pei, Xiao-Ping Yin, Jia-Liang Ren, Yun Wang, Lu-Yao Ma, Xiao-Guang Du, Bu-Lang Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patterns of cortical oxygenation may predict the response to stenting in subjects with renal artery stenosis: A radiomics-based model.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ping Wang *CT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Xu Pei *CT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Xiao-Ping YinCT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China. yinxiaoping78@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7386-1069
Jia-Liang RenGE HealthCare, ShangHai, 200120, China.
Yun WangCT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Lu-Yao MaCT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Xiao-Guang DuChengde Medical University, Chengde, 067000, Hebei Province, China.
Bu-Lang GaoCT/MRI Room, Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Mechanism and Regulations, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 East Yuhua Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CNChengde Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was to assess the effect of the predictive model for distinguishing clear cell RCC (ccRCC) from non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) by establishing predictive radiomic models based on enhanced-computed tomography (CT) images of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 190 cases with RCC confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed, with the patients being randomly divided into two groups, including the training set and testing set according to the ratio of 7:3. A total of 396 radiomic features were computationally obtained and analyzed with the Correlation between features, Univariate Logistics and Multivariate Logistics. Finally, 4 features were selected, and three machine models (Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (LR)) were established to discriminate RCC subtypes. The radiomics performance was compared with that of radiologist diagnosis. In the testing set, the RF model had an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.909, a sensitivity of 0.956, and a specificity of 0.538. The SVM model had an AUC value of 0.841, a sensitivity of 1.0, and a specificity of 0.231, in the testing set. The LR model had an AUC value of 0.906, a sensitivity of 0.956, and a specificity of 0.692, in the testing set. The sensitivity and specificity of radiologist diagnosis to differentiate ccRCC from non-ccRCC were 0.850 and 0.581, respectively, with the AUC value of the radiologist diagnosis as 0.69. In conclusion, radiomics models based on CT imaging data show promise for augmenting radiological diagnosis in renal cancer, especially for differentiating ccRCC from non-ccRCC.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellComputational BiologyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidney NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID34215760
PMCPMC8253856
OpenAlexW3175840430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.